UK Man Wins Court Victory Over BBC for 9/11 Coverup Broadcast


Tony Rooke adamantly refused to pay a TV license fee because he alleged that the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the attacks on the World Trade Center Buildings on that fateful day of 9/11/01.

It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 OVER 20 minutes before the collapse actually occurred.

World Trade Center Building 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was NOT hit by a plane on 9/11, but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day in the same pancake-like manner as the 2 other WTC Buildings that actually WERE struck by a plane.

Because of this evidence, Mr. Rooke said that the BBC HAD to have had PRIOR KNOWLEDGE to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack.

He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest.

Mr.Rooke was found NOT GUILTY, and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

(Video) Tony Rooke at the Magistrates’ Court – BBC TV license

Below is the tape of the report absolutely showing that WTC Building 7 is still standing while the BBC talking head is reporting that it had collapsed.

It will be amusing to here the arguments from the people who still want to believe the government’s “official” story and how they’ll be able to explain away on how this is even possible without prior knowledge.

Note: The BBC talking heads call WTC #7 the Salomon Brothers Building

Watch for yourself!

And below is the video that debunks NIST’s “official version” of the collapse of WTC Building #7.


Time to wake up people.

You have been duped. 9/11 was a false flag operation!

SEE RELATED: Building 7 – Still The Smoking Gun

SEE RELATED: 9/11 – The Truth In 5 Minutes

SEE RELATED: EVERY AMERICAN MUST SEE THIS: Researcher, Author & Flight Attendant Drops 9/11 False Flag Mind Blowing PROOF!!!