China Poised To DEMAND U.S. LAND As Payment For U.S. Debt


VIA| Could real estate on American soil owned by China be set up as “development zones” in which the communist nation could establish Chinese-owned businesses and bring in its citizens to the U.S. to work?

That’s part of an evolving proposal Beijing has been developing quietly since 2009 to convert more than $1 trillion of U.S debt it owns into equity.

Under the plan, China would own U.S. businesses, U.S. infrastructure and U.S. high-value land, all with a U.S. government guarantee against loss.

Yu Qiao, a professor of economics in the School of Public Policy and Management at Tsighua University in Beijing, proposed in 2009 a plan for the U.S. government to guarantee foreign investments in the United States.

WND has reliable information that the Bank of China, China’s central bank, has continued to advance the plan to convert China’s holdings of U.S. debt into equity owned by China in the U.S.

The Obama administration, under the plan, would grant a financial guarantee as an inducement for China to convert U.S. debt into Chinese direct equity investment. China would take ownership of successful U.S. corporations, potentially profitable infrastructure projects and high-value U.S. real estate.

The plan would be designed to induce China to resume lending to the U.S. on a nearly zero-interest basis.

However, converting Chinese debt to equity investments in the United States could easily add another $1 trillion to outstanding Obama administration guarantees issued in the current economic crisis.

As of November 2012, China owned $1.17 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities, according to U.S. Department of Treasury and Federal Reserve Board calculations published Jan. 16.

Concerned about the unrestrained growth in U.S. debt under the Obama administration, China has reduced by 97 percent its holdings in short-term U.S. Treasury bills. China’s holding of $573.7 billion in August 2008, prior to the massive bank bailouts and stimulus programs triggered by the collapse in the U.S. mortgage market, dwindled to $5.96 billion by March 2011.

Treasury bills are short-term debt that matures in one year or less, sold to finance U.S. debt. Holdings of Treasury bills are included in the $1.17 trillion of total Treasury securities owned by China as of November 2012.

In addition to a national debt in excess of $16 trillion, the U.S. government in 2010 faced over $70 trillion in unfunded obligations, including Social Security and Medicare benefits scheduled to be paid retiring baby boomer retirees in the coming decades, with unfunded obligations showing no sign of being reduced with Congress at a deadlock over reducing federal government spending.

Yu Qiao observed that if the U.S. dollar collapsed under the weight of proposed Obama administration trillion-dollar budget deficits into the foreseeable future, holders of U.S. debt would face substantial losses that the Financial Times estimated “would devastate Asians’ hard-earned wealth and terminate economic globalization.”

“The basic idea is to turn Asian savings, China’s in particular, into real business interests rather than let them be used to support U.S. over-consumption,” Yu Qiao wrote, reflecting themes commonly suggested by Chinese government officials. “While fixed-income securities are vulnerable to any fall in the value of the dollar, equity claims on sound corporations and infrastructure projects are at less risk from a currency default,” he continued.

The problem is that, in a struggling U.S. economy, China does not want to trade its investment in U.S. Treasury debt securities, with their inherent risk of dollar devaluation, for equally risky investments in U.S. corporations and infrastructure projects.

“But Asians do not want to bear the risk of this investment because of market turbulence and a lack of knowledge of cultural, legal and regulatory issues in U.S. businesses,” he stressed. “However if a guarantee scheme were created, Asian savers could be willing to invest directly in capital-hungry U.S. industries.”

Yu Qiao’s plan included four components:

       1. China would negotiate with the U.S. government to create a “crisis relief facility,” or CRF. The CRF “would be used alongside U.S. federal efforts to stabilize the banking system and to invest in capital-intensive infrastructure projects such as high-speed railroad from Boston to Washington, D.C.

       2. China would pool a portion of its holdings of Treasury bonds under the CFR umbrella to convert sovereign debt into equity. Any CFR funds that were designated for investment in U.S. corporations would still be owned and managed by U.S. equity holders, with the Asians holding minority equity shares “that would, like preferred stock, be convertible.” 

       3. The U.S. government would act as a guarantor, “providing a sovereign guarantee scheme to assure the investment principal of the CRF against possible default of targeted companies or projects”.

      4. The Federal Reserve would set up a special account to supply the liquidity the CRF would require to swap sovereign debt into industrial investment in the United States.

“The CRF would lessen Asians’ concern about implicit default of sovereign debts caused by a collapsing dollar,” Yu Qiao concluded. “It would cost little and help the U.S. by channeling funds to business investment.”

  • that would be the worst thing ever that the united states should do…was the land part of the deal when U.S borrowed the money…

  • paul

    Do people actually believe this? This is almost as bad as some of the rubbish from infowars. I expect my brother in law to start quoting this rubbish to me shortly.

  • paul

    Ha ha ha deleting comments. What a great news site.

  • Robert Bostick

    The $ Axioms of modern money in America and other Monetarily Sovereign nations like China, England, Japan, Canada and Australia.

    “Axiom #1 — As the sole issuer of its own currency the U.S. can
    never, involuntarily, face insolvency in its own currency, nor can
    any of its Federal Programs.

    Axiom #2– The U.S. is not constrained by revenue per se to

    Axiom #3 — A sole currency issuer does not tax and sell
    Treasury securities to raise revenue, it taxes to manage
    aggregate demand. (It also taxes to force acceptance of its
    paper currency, manage income distribution and domestic and
    foreign market incentives). It buys and sells Treasury securities to manage the term
    structure of its interest rates.

    Axiom #4 — Until the Federal government/Federal Reserve
    spends currency into the economy there is no currency to tax or
    to be used to purchase Treasury securities.

    The Federal Reserve did not run out and collect tax revenue to finance the $29 trillion bank bailout.”

  • Why do people believe this kind of nonsense?

  • SteveD

    1. The US could “pay off” China tomorrow simply by transferring ALREADY EXISTING dollars from China’s securities accounts to China’s reserve accounts at the FRB. Voila! DEBT. PAID. OFF.
    2. This article is total bullshit except for one little thing. If seen to fruition, this will be just another in a long line of neo-liberal rent extraction scams-to make a few fat cats even richer and make everyone else way poorer.

  • “In addition to a national debt in excess of $16 trillion, the U.S. government in 2010 faced over $70 trillion in unfunded obligations…..”
    While its extension of finance capital, which has no nationality or national boundary, its also warning of death to US imperialism!!
    This incidentally, only may bring revolutionary tide but not socialism, unless a revolutionary party unites the working class and defeats capitalism!

  • Adam

    Who believes this? “China is take over U.S. interest. Let us cite one source and show you a cartoon we found on Google” The irony of this website is that if you believe it then you are definitely a sheep.

  • Dave

    More ridiculous fake news. And the headline, as usual, has no connection to the actual article and most of the article is just a regurgitation of well known economics stuff. Really, really poor.