Malia and Sasha Obama Were Loaned by Their Real Parents so America Would Accept the Fake First Family

BIN| I know this briefly made the rounds last year…but I’m not sure everyone saw it and I have been meaning to post a blog about it and just get it down in black and white for safekeeping and also so the facts are preserved. I don’t want anyone to forget how cheated and lied to we were by this last presidential puppet they installed. I mean, they took it to a whole new level with the creation of Barry Soetoro.

And I feel like we are constantly inundated with so much info that sometimes important details that should be preserved are swept away with the tide and forgotten about…never to return.  So here it is:


(I originally posted the following on Facebook in December of 2016):

I saw the video that Fisher of Men did on this titled “I Found Malia and Sasha’s Real Parents”. So just to note…he’s the one who originally made this connection. After he made that video he was visited by the secret service and is now in prison on trumped up charges….they say he is a “domestic terrorist”, but we all know that means he’s simply a threat to them.

So people in the alternative media have wondered for a long time who Malia and Sasha’s real parents are (being that Michelle is most likely a man). This is a great piece done on the topic in 2013 by Eowyn at Fellowship of the Minds. Definitely worth the read.

But just a few basic points from it. None of the ancestry or genealogy sites have any record of either girl. has no birth records for Malia or Natasha Obama. In fact no birth records can be found on either girl ANYWHERE.

There are no pictures of the Obama’s with the girls when they were babies. (Actually only ONE single photo has been found and I’m no expert on photoshop but it doesn’t take an expert to see that it’s a very sloppily flung together photoshopped picture. It’s almost embarrassing to look at really…they did such a bad job.)

This is the only pic that can be found of the Obamas with Malia or Sasha when they’re young. And this looks extremely photoshopped. See how they pop out of the background like that? Not natural.

And then also, there are ZERO pictures to be found ANYWHERE of a pregnant Michelle Obama.

So here’s where it all gets interesting…Anita Blanchard and Martin Nesbitt are a married couple who have been close friends with the Obama’s going back to their early Chicago days. Martin Nesbitt was the Obama campaign treasurer and close friend… and his wife, Dr. Anita Blanchard, is the woman said to have quote on quote “delivered the children of Obama” (remember that semantics matter here).

So Dr. Anita and her husband became Sasha and Malia’s “godparents”. They are both very tight with Valerie Jarrett and crew going back to Obama’s beginning in Chicago.

So last year, the youtuber Fisher of Men looked this couple up (after seeing a 2008 NY Times article which referenced them..and he made a very interesting discovery. In his video…when he put the following picture up on the screen (the pic straight below) my jaw dropped.

READ MORE: More and More Americans Think Michelle Obama is a Man! 

Because the resemblance is so shocking. (Sorry it’s a tad blurry. It’s a screenshot off his video) After seeing this pic….I  started paying attention.

The older girl Malia is a dead ringer for Martin Nesbitt and the younger girl Sasha looks just like Anita Blanchard.

The pics below are collages I made from pics I found of the girls and the couple,  just doing image searches.. just to show some more comparisons.Malia looks like dad and Sasha looks like mom.

The next pic is a picture I found of Martin Nesbitt with Obama that really struck me because his awkward posture and stance reminds me EXACTLY of awkward Malia Obama and how she holds herself…her posture when she walks, her long gaping strides, etc.

The way he holds himself in this pic is Malia to a tee. She has a very distinct slumped over awkward posture when she walks…like her dad Martin here.

Martin was Obama’s campaign treasurer and there are many photos of them together online, that date way back. They are obviously VERY good, longtime friends.

  • talklessthinkmore

    Dear lawwd. I can’t believe someone wrote this shit. Republicans will do anything to disgrace Obama just cuz he’s black. GTFOH..and get a life….racist pig

    • Jessica McKenzie Bailey

      Right? This is the most ridiculous shit I’ve ever seen. Unliking their Facebook page immediately! Not ONE credible source… oh, but these are “facts”? Have you “writers” ever written a research paper in college? Did you go to college? Wikipedia is NOT a credible source. Fucking morons!

    • Dubya Dottie

      Obama is gay and Moochelle is a man.. Look on YouTube. …Michael Vaughn Robinson

    • Jugears Soetero

      yea that’s it. Everyone who hates HALF WHITE OBAMA is a racist. You don’t even KNOW what a real racist is. REAL RACISTS HANG PEOPLE FROM TREES. That’s a real racist.

      You people are morons. I lived in South Carolina in my youth in the 60s and saw black men hung. You people are a disgrace to their memories. ALL OF YOU LIBERAL BLACKS.. You sicken me beyond my core.

    • David

      Talklessthinkmore++You, at first, made a good point, until, you got into the race thing. Using Collective Thinking, as now, you have OFFICIALLY pigged yourself. We can see your mind is already in the gutter. Why would we engage in further dialogue with you? Have a nice day.

    • Storme Jaynes

      Gtfoh… Obama ain’t black.

      • Sandra G. Holland

        Correct. He is half black. Half white.

    • Sandra G. Holland

      Not because he’s black. Whether or not any of the above is true, Obama hates America. That is why people turned against him.

  • Lily Angel

    Would be great to find some DNA that could prove this…there really is some resemblance so why isn’t anyone digging into this deeper? Interesting…

    • GrayArea

      Cause digging deeper would make you even more of a retard. You guys need to get laid.

      • Lily Angel

        Wow! I would really be hurt if your opinion actually mattered Troll!

      • Eric Stuart

        You try it first

      • Thomas Engel

        What is troll pay from Soros these days?

    • Shane Turner

      because they will accidently on purpose go missing,,,thats why,,,lol

    • Cindy Roberts

      Obama is a plant. Keep digging, it gets enlightening. God will repay them all.

      • disqus_1AeuiVk50Y

        what kind of plant is he?

    • because they are democrats and what they say must be true!!

    • Bradford Llyoncrest

      There was DNA testing on the grandparents of Obama and they where not his. So Obama’s mother was fake like the kids too

  • My Two Cents

    Oh lawdy!! I can’t believe the bull shit that is made up and posted! Sheesh. SMDH

    • Anticopyright –

      3 comments in 3 years on disqus? Fake account much?

    • R Dub

      If you don’t like that BS, you’ll REALLY hate this truth as well. Don’t ask don’t tell??? I never had to ask, I COULD TELL (2007). The Obama’s are phony puppets of the NWO…

      • Lynne

        You are really funny aren’t you? I am sure that Melania is a nice person. Having a foreigner whore as first lady, one who posed nude for magazines, is so much better than the very classy woman we had for 8 years. What is truly disturbing is that you and others of your ilk really can’t see it. One has to wonder why. Surely all of you can’t be so uneducated that you read and believe all of this nonsense. If so our schools have failed you all. We had a man, married one time, with two wonderful children, but you prefer a man who CHEATED on wife one with wife 2, then CHEATED on wife 2 with wife 3. And you purport to be the party of family values. Hah!

        • R Dub

          Thank God we were spared the spectacle of Michael/Michelle posing in a bikini. Melania is a self made woman who had her own career and money when she and the President met. She speaks several languages and is very well educated. And as to being a foreign whore, I would stack Melania against a domestic under educated whore such as yourself. And as to my ilk not seeing it? I saw the Adam’s apple the size of a softball, the perpetual 12 hr a day Nixon-ian 5 O’Clock shadow on Michael’s muzzle, the thick leg hair protruding though his pantyhose, the size 18 high heels and that scandalous BULGE under his skirt (housing his pet Anaconda). And as for cheating, Barrack and his personal trainer Mr. Love were having a n affair in the white house! And as to how I can believe this so-called nonsense??? “I believe my lying eyes coupled with common sense and critical thinking. You are correct in the fact that I am not under educated and now enjoying a comfortable retirement from the private sector. And lastly family values are important to myself and my beautiful wife of 30 years… You self righteous liberal snowflake POS. Get back to your safe place and… STFU!!!

          • Lynne

            So eloquent aren’t you? Your education level truly does show with the profanity laden response and name calling. Here are some truths for you. I am a former Republican and I grew up in a military household. I am quite educated and well read. I not only have critical thinking skills, I research everything from a multitude of sources. And I am fed up with the crazy nonsense that people like you spout as facts. You are delusional, plain and simple. Nothing you wrote has any merit, so I can only surmise you have mental problems. For that I am sorry. You should be proud of being married for 30 years (though I have you beat at 37 years), but how you can accept someone who is supposed to lead our great country who is a cheater, lies without blinking an eye, is disrespectful to women, and very possibly is a traitor, is beyond me. Why can’t you put country before party? He is going to ruin us and you can’t even see it. Your comments about the Obama’s show you to be a racist ass hole. Thank God you and yes, your “ilk” are the minority.

          • R Dub

            As long as you get my point. BLA-BLA-BLA… Thanks to that purple lipped b’stard who’s hiding out in a homosexual brothel in Indonesia we are in the continued stages of a civil war. You settle in on your side, and I will do like wise.

          • Lynne

            Normally this is where I would just throw up my hands and say, well you can’t argue with stupid, but you seem to be so fixated on the sexuality of Michelle (so much so that you went into such great detail of all that you personally observed, which means you sure do pay attention, LOL), and make disparaging comments regarding homosexuals, so I can only assume that you are both a racist and hate those who are gay. So I just want to point out that my brother served during the Vietnam War, and his husband was a medal awarded surgeon during the Korean War, who was credited with saving many lives. So as you sit there throwing shit all over many people, understand they fought hard for your right to do so.

          • R Dub


          • Lynne

            A fact is something that is commonly known to be true, has been personally observed or documented. Unless you had been creeping around and peeking through windows, you have no basis for what is considered to be a FACT. You don’t even have an opinion. Unfortunately that seems to be something not many on the far right have anymore; the ability to tell the difference. to be honest, your fixation on this indicates the need for therapy of some kind. Many have the opinion that when a person has such a strong reaction to homosexuals that it is because they themselves are closeted and have repressed their feelings for, oh, I don’t know, 30 years or more I would guess. Isn’t that how long you have been married? Just an observation from afar. Only you know the facts.

          • R Dub

            Lynne, sounds like you’ve had an add-a dick-tomy. At what age did you discover you were a MAN inside of an unattractive womans body??? I am 100% military grade, MAN. Now Mr snowflake back to your safe space and continue your Whore-Moan therapy and… STFU!!!

          • Lynne

            Oh my…. sounds like I hit a nerve. Unlike you, I do not need to even respond to your profanity, name calling and derogatory comments about my womanhood because I know who I am. Do you know who you are? Seems blondes are smarter than you think. One thing I would take issue with; I have never known anyone in the military (and I know a lot) who would be caught dead saying out loud that they were “100 % military grade, MAN”. So either you never served at all (or you were in the Navy, the sissies of the 4 branches) or you are just so darn insecure you have to bluster and spout nonsense to make yourself puff up with pride at your idiotic words. And if you did serve, I wonder how many Ladyboys you have met over the years?

          • R Dub

            compliments to me from “Michael La Vaughn Robinson” 2.0. And I repeat: 100% Mega Military grade MAN! LOL LOL LOL !!!!! (Chad Bono comes to mind)

          • Lynne

            You need help. I hope you get it. I know a real man when I see it and hear it, and you my dear have some identity issues you have never dealt with. Your obsessive talk regarding sexuality and proclaiming your manhood in big letters says it all. But more than that, you are incapable of any clear, logical, thinking,and sound like an uneducated, insecure little “man”. Politically you are just ill informed and not well read. It has been entertaining, but honestly you are a waste of my time. *yawn*

        • jcoftexas
  • Anticopyright –

    The resemblance of these 2 girls to “obamas” best friends is striking. They do look just like them. Like my son looks like me.

  • Domenica Stone
    • petulantes

      Yeah because those obo heads look out of proportion and Michelle has linebacker shoulders. not in this pic though

    • Lynne

      I work in graphics. No it is not a photo shopped pic, but good try.

    • Bradford Llyoncrest

      What’s has happened to America is that all who are democrats are brainwashed by communist. The left are terrorists and the problem of the world. We need to identify them and lock up the anti-American trash

    • R Dub

      Mr. and Mr. Barrack and Michael La Vaughn Robinson Obama. This picture is of two men and two children who belong to friends of these two phony’s. Sickening…

  • Dubya Dottie

    Michelle is a man. Lookitup on YouTube. I often wondered which one of the Obamas was the parent because certainly it could not be both of them together

    • R Dub

      Michael La Vaughn Robinson IS a man…

  • Jeff Wyatt

    This is bullshit
    Move on

  • Candace Way

    I mean c’mon now. .. this is utter nonsense. It falls into the territory of continuously trying to discredit former President Obama’s birth certificate.

    Here is a thought, why don’t you do some helpful volunteering?

    • SandyT

      Speaking of the birth certificate…if it IS real and true, then Obama was never constitutionally eligible to be president. One MUST be a “natural born citizen” to be eligible for the presidency or vice presidency. The “birthers” were trying to prove that he wasn’t born in the U.S., but that was not the right thing to focus on. He could have been born IN the White House and still wouldn’t be eligible, simply because one MUST be born in the U.S. to parents (plural/both parents) who are themselves, citizens. Barack’s Kenyan, British subject father was not a citizen. Only his mother was a citizen. Barack is a citizen, but he is not a “natural born citizen”.
      By the same token, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal are also NOT eligible to be president or vice president. Cruz was born in Canada and only his mother was a citizen. He was born with dual U.S./Canadian citizenship. Ted was still a Canadian citizen until he renounced it in May 2014. Rubio and Jindal were born in the U.S., Marco in Miami and Bobby in Baton Rouge, but none of their respective parents were citizens at the time their sons were born. Both major political parties ignored the “natural born citizen” clause of the Constitution!

      • Six Gunner Taylor


      • Storme Jaynes

        All the sudden the nay sayers fall silent?

      • Sandra G. Holland


      • Lynne

        This is a very nice graphic, but inaccurate. First, though “natural born citizen” is used in the Constitution, no where is it defined specifically. The one thing we do know however is that a natural born citizen has been determined to be either someone born in the United States OR if born outside of the states, at least one parent is a U. S citizen which then means the child is considered to be a natural born citizen and does not have to go through the naturalization process. So President Obama, being born in Hawaii (which last I looked was indeed a part of the U.S) is natural born, and even if he wasn’t, his mother was a United States Citizen, thus he automatically is as well.

        • SandyT

          Sorry that you have bought into the whole narrative, Lynne. Obama’s birth to a U.S. citizen, simply made him a “citizen”, not a natural born citizen. A natural born citizen is someone without any ties to ANY other nation, which means that he/she MUST be born on U.S. soil (jus soli) to parents (plural/both parents) who are themselves, citizens (jus sanguinis), soil AND blood. If even one parent is not a citizen, then the child also inherits the citizenship of whatever nation that parent is still a citizen of, as well as having U.S. citizenship. All three, place of birth, citizenship of the father AND citizenship of the mother MUST be of the U.S. and no other nation that could possibly claim that child as their citizen or be able to demand loyalty from him/her. What is so hard to understand about total loyalty? It’s a very simple concept that even a 2nd grader should be able to understand! As far as there being no “definition” of natural born citizen in the Constitution goes, did you see or need any definition of president, senator or representative in the Constitution? If “citizen” and “natural born citizen meant the same thing to the Founders, they would not have used the two different terms in the Constitution, and there would have been no need for the “grandfather clause” (“…or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution…”). Eight of the first nine presidents had to be grandfathered in, since they were “citizens” but they were not “born in the U.S. to parents who were citizens”! All presidents thereafter HAD to be born in the U.S. to a citizen father and a citizen mother. Of course, prior to the 1930’s, a woman’s citizenship hinged upon the citizenship of her father until she married, then upon her husband as of the date of their marriage. Some people have tried to argue that some of the early presidents had mothers who were not citizens, but that is not the truth. If they had not been citizens at the time they married, they became U.S. citizens, simply by marrying a citizen. It’s called “coverture”. Look it up if you don’t believe me. Too many people these days have no actual knowledge of what our Founders wanted for our nation. They have been led to believe that simply being a “citizen” is enough to be president or vice president. Those two are the ONLY offices which require one to be a “natural born citizen”. Senators, representatives and even Supreme Court Justices may be simply “citizens”, even naturalized citizens.
          Don’t try to say the Harvard Law Review article refutes what I have said. Katyal and Clement relied on the Naturalization Act of 1790 to say that children born out of the U.S. to at least one parent who was a citizen, is a “natural born citizen”, failing to mention at all that the 1790 Act was repealed and declared null and void by the Naturalization Act of 1795, written by the same men who wrote and passed the 1790 version and also signed into law by Pres. George Washington. The 1795 version left out the words “natural born” and left “citizen”. Any more questions? There are at least four SCOTUS decisions that include the definition of natural born citizen as one born on U.S. soil to parents who are themselves, citizens.

          • Lynne

            I am sorry, but you are the one who has ‘bought into the narrative”. I am sure it took awhile to look all of that up, but here are some facts that might also add to what you have written. Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?
            “The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this
            way: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State
            wherein they reside.” But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills
            in the gaps. The Constitution authorizes the Congress to create clarifying legislation in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment; the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, also allows the Congress to create law regarding naturalization, which includes
            citizenship. Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution.
            Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”
            *Anyone born inside the United States *
            *Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
            * Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
            * Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
            *Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
            *Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
            * Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this
            A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
            Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the
            children of military families to be considered natural-born, for example. And as for court decisions? Well…..
            Recent court rulings on presidential eligibility
            Hollander v. McCain
            (New Hampshire 2008) ruling: “Those born “in the United States, and
            subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been
            considered American citizens under American law in effect since the
            time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency,

            Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana
            (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling: “Based upon the language of
            Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons
            born within the borders of the United States are “natural born
            Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the
            citizenship of their parents.”

            Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling: “It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.“

            Purpura v. Obama
            (New Jersey 2012) ruling: “No court, federal, state or administrative,
            has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a ‘natural
            born Citizen’ due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in
            Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British
            Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual
            citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny
            him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel
            here. … The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well
            intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point
            of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born
            Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.”

            Voeltz v. Obama
            (Florida 2012) ruling: “However, the United States Supreme Court has
            concluded that ‘[e]very person born in the United States, and subject to
            the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United
            States. ‘Other courts that have considered the issue in the context of
            challenges to the qualifications of candidates for the office of
            President of the United States have come to the same conclusion. [The
            judge cites Hollander and Ankeny]

            Voeltz v. Obama
            (2nd suit Florida 2012) ruling: “In addition, to the extent that the
            complaint alleges that President Obama is not a “natural born citizen”
            even though born in the United States, the Court is in agreement with
            other courts that have considered this issue, namely, that persons
            born within the borders of the United States are “natural born
            citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purpose, regardless of the
            citizenship of their parents. [Citations to Wong, Hollander, Ankeny].

            Allen v. Obama
            (Arizona 2012) ruling: “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by
            United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States
            Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co. , 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. … Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise”

            Farrar (et al.) v. Obama
            (Georgia 2012) ruling: “In 2009, the Indiana Court of Appeals (“Indiana
            Court”) addressed facts and issues similar to those before this court. [Ankeny] v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). … The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. … This Court finds the decision and analysis of [Ankeny] persuasive.”

            Paige v. Obama et al. (Vermont 2012) ruling: While the court has no doubt at this point that Emmerich de Vattel’s treatise The Law of Nations
            was a work of significant value to the founding fathers, the court does
            not conclude that his phrase–“The natives, or natural born citizens,
            are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”–has
            constitutional significance or that his use of “parents” in the plural
            has particular significance. Thus far, no judicial decision has adopted
            such logic in connection with this or any related issues. In fact, the
            most comprehensive decision on the topic, Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana,
            examines the historical basis of the use of the phrase, including the
            English common law in effect at the time of independence, and concludes
            that the expression “natural born Citizen” is not dependent on
            the nationality of the parents but reflects the status of a person born
            into citizenship instead of having citizenship subsequently bestowed. The distinction is eminently logical.

            Fair v. Obama
            (Maryland 2012) ruling: The issue of the definition of “natural born
            citizen” is thus firmly resolved by the United States Supreme Court in a
            prior opinion [US v Wong], and as this court sees it, that holding is binding on the ultimate issue in this case. [The Court also cites Ankeny at length, and determined that Obama is eligible.]

            Strunk v. New York State Board of Elections
            ruling on motion for reconsideration (2013): … the Fourteenth Amendment
            defines citizenship as “[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the Untied
            States.” Moreover, the United States Supreme Court held, in Miller v Albright (452 US 420, 423-424 [1998]), that:

            There are “two sources of citizenship and two only: birth and naturalization.” United States v Wong Kim Ark, 169 US 649, 702 (1898).
            Within the former category, the Fourteenth Amendment of the
            Constitution guarantees that every person “born in the United States,
            and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of
            the United States, and needs no naturalization.” 169 US at 702.

            Thus, anyone born in the United States is a natural-born citizen, irrespective of parentage.

            In Re: Nomination Petition Of Rafael Edward Cruz (Pennsylvania, 2016) ruling: “this Court holds, consistent with the common law precedent and statutory history, that a “natural born citizen” includes any person who is a United States citizen from birth.“

          • SandyT

            Naturalization law cannot make anyone a natural born citizen. The 14th Amendment did not make anyone a natural born citizen, either! What you have quoted comes from the Naturalization Act of 1952, Section 301, (also known as the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952), which was later codified into Title 8, US Code 1401. The Constitution gave Congress the authority “to establish rules for naturalization”, but not the authority to make anyone a “natural born citizen”. ONLY by birth on U.S. soil to parents who are both citizens, is a child a ‘natural born citizen’.

            “There are “two sources of citizenship and two only: birth and naturalization.” United States v Wong Kim Ark, 169 US 649, 702 (1898).
            Within the former category, the Fourteenth Amendment of the
            Constitution guarantees that every person “born in the United States,
            and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of
            the United States, and needs no naturalization.” 169 US at 702.” ~~~~~~ Do you see the words, “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”? While a child born on U.S. soil may be a citizen by virtue of having been born in the U.S., he/she is NOT a natural born citizen, if his parent/parents are STILL subject to the jurisdiction of whatever country they are citizens of. They may have to follow our laws, as long as they are here, (of course, in the case of those crossing the border illegally, they have already broken our laws) but they are not totally under our jurisdiction! That is a misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment. Do you really believe that our Founders wanted someone like “an anchor baby” to grow up to be president? How insane! NO child should be considered a “citizen” by birth in the U.S. if he/she doesn’t have at least one parent who is a legal resident or a citizen of the U.S. The 14th Amendment made citizens of the newly freed slaves after the Civil War, but didn’t make them “natural born citizens”. However, when one “citizen” married another “citizen” and had a child on U.S. soil, that child is a “natural born citizen”.

            Obama, Cruz, Rubio and Jindal are “citizens” but they are NOT natural born citizens and are ineligible to be president! No lower court or state election commission can overrule the established Supreme Court decisions.

    • Eric Stuart

      Why dont YOU?

  • Cindy Roberts

    I heard this before. God will reveal them ALL.
    In Jesus’ name.

  • Agustus Jones

    Jeez. President Obama is no longer in office and his power and influence of those who dislike him is still strong. lol The man is out of office but some are still looking for the brass ring.

    Please post links to your articles connecting the dots with President Trump, the Russians and those in his administration. Be just as determined and wildly imaginative as you have with your articles relating to former President Obama. Ohhh… You can’t imagine those Russian links? lol

    Ok… Nothing against the current First Lady but please post links to your articles about her working illegally in the US during her model days… Ohh… You can’t imagine that?

    Surprise me and post as many links digging into President Trump as you have about digging into former President Obama.

  • Marie Scherbaum Snow

    I know that ‘Fisher of Men’ is incarcerated in a Federal Detention Center for a YouTube video he posted.

  • hidden_agenda714

    lol. white people are still mad Obama won. This also has to be one of the dumbest crap I’ve seen on the internet next to the fake Russia meddling.

    Everyone knows Russia is just a faje distraction to Israel hijacking our election, our media and the jets on 9/11 by remote hacking into the auto pilot systems.

  • Innocent Ndukaihe

    Meaning that America was led by gays, hypocrites and infected the world. Thank God for his mercy and second chance.

  • Thomas Gor

    I understand that he uses a SSN that is that of a dead guy born in 1890. And let’s see those bulges in Michell’s pants suits again??? And how about that girl that knew Barry as a kid in Hawii?? She’s outed him as a drug fiend and a male prostitute. And he wasn’t doing old ladies neither!!

  • Patricia Lockwood

    Yes ,do agree, as no baby pics

  • klaus barbie

    The Obongo kids are such ugly niggers like their parents. The fakes one.

  • Rebecca Mayhew

    This is the dumbest shit I have read in a long time…I ought to sue you for the destruction of the brain cells I lost while plodding through it. You’re probably a Trump-supporting traitor too. Signed, A Proud Sheep…

  • Pingback: Michelle Obama Is TRANSGENDER: See For Yourself! | Sheep Media()