Is there a depopulation agenda?
Deborah Tavares http://stopthecrime.net/
On December 2, 2017, members of LA SkyWatch put on a demonstration regarding the Santa Rosa, California fires, standing with signs about the fires being that of Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), a part of the Agenda 21 plan and calling it ….California’s 9/11
SEE THIS TOO: Agenda 21 For Dummies
Check out this short video via John Knox:
….AND PLEASE SHARE THIS TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO GET OUT AND EXPOSE THIS HORRENDOUS AGENDA. THANK YOU!!!!
Because of the increasing censorship and ‘on purpose’ ad demonization, now more than ever, I really need your help in order to keep this small, independent media site going and sharing information with you 365 days/year. If you like my work and you can assist me, my Patreon account allows for a small monthly pledge (here) or you can support this work with a small donation via Paypal (here). THANK YOU for your concern. – Julie Telgenhoff, Creator of A Sheep No More
It looks like the cabal that controls the entire world is letting it be know that they are exposing pretty much what they’ve been doing all along ……just legitimizing it.
Like we didn’t know that they are genetically modifying germs to make bio-weapons …what a joke!
On Tuesday, federal officials ended a moratorium they put on funding research that alters germs to make them more lethal.
The New York Times reports,
Such work can now proceed, said Dr. Francis S. Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health, but only if a scientific panel decides that the benefits justify the risks.
Some scientists are eager to pursue these studies because they may show, for example, how a bird flu could mutate to more easily infect humans, or could yield clues to making a better vaccine.
Critics say these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic.
Now, a government panel will require that researchers show that their studies in this area are scientifically sound and that they will be done in a high-security lab.
The pathogen to be modified must pose a serious health threat, and the work must produce knowledge — such as a vaccine — that would benefit humans. Finally, there must be no safer way to do the research.
“We see this as a rigorous policy,” Dr. Collins said. “We want to be sure we’re doing this right.”
In October 2014, all federal funding was halted on efforts to make three viruses more dangerous: the flu virus, and those causing Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).
But the new regulations apply to any pathogen that could potentially cause a pandemic. For example, they would apply to a request to create an Ebola virus transmissible through the air, said Dr. Collins.
In 2011, an outcry arose when laboratories in Wisconsin and the Netherlands revealed that they were trying to mutate the lethal H5N1 bird flu in ways that would let it jump easily between ferrets, which are used to model human flu susceptibility.
Tensions rose in 2014 after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention accidentally exposed lab workers to anthrax and shipped a deadly flu virus to a laboratory that had asked for a benign strain.
That year, the N.I.H. also found vials of smallpox in a freezer that had been forgotten for 50 years.
That virus is a coronavirus carried by camels that has infected about 2,100 people since it was discovered in 2012, and has killed about a third of them, according to the World Health Organization.
Critics of such research had mixed reactions. “There’s less than meets the eye,” said Richard H. Ebright, a molecular biologist and bioweapons expert at Rutgers University.
Although he applauded the requirement for review panels, he said he would prefer independent panels to government ones.
Marc Lipsitch, an epidemiologist who directs the Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics at the Harvard School of Public Health, called review panels “a small step forward.”
Recent disease-enhancing experiments, he said, “have given us some modest scientific knowledge and done almost nothing to improve our preparedness for pandemics, and yet risked creating an accidental pandemic.”
Therefore, he said, he hoped the panels would turn down such work.
Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, said he believed some laboratories could do such work safely, but wanted restrictions on what they could publish.
“Physicists long ago learned to distinguish between what can be publicly available and what’s classified,” he added, referring to nuclear weapons research. “We want to keep some of this stuff on a need-to-know basis.”
If you like my work and you can assist me, my Patreon account allows for a small monthly pledge (here) or you can support this work with a small donation via Paypal (here). THANK YOU for your concern. – Julie Telgenhoff, Creator of A Sheep No More
They told us they would spray us and they did not meet any resistance …and therefore, they stuck to their word.
They’re blocking the sun from it’s ability to heat the earth, promote growth and fuel life on this earth with their created solar shield geoengineering technology …utilizing their false global warming risks that they themselves are actually trying to manifest by their own means…
Here is the proof for the Harvard’s Solar Geoengineering Research Program: www.geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu
In just 5 hours (condensed), I will show you that they can and that they DO spray us to the point that the sun is a completely unrecognizable object behind a veil of plasma heavy metals intertwined with blood cells, morgellons fibers and whatever illnesses du jour they pick for us to inhale.
And so I repeat ….WHY isn’t anyone talking about this massive, destructive to all life on this precious earth, program???
Via RichiefromBoston II:
****I need your help in order to keep this small, independent media site going and sharing information with you 365 days/year because of the increasing censorship and ‘on purpose’ ad demonization. If you like my work and you can assist me, my Patreon account allows for a small monthly pledge (here) or you can support this work with a small donation via Paypal (here). THANK YOU for your concern from the bottom of my heart. – Julie Telgenhoff, Creator of A Sheep No More****
After each one of these increasingly obvious manmade events, one thing is becoming abundantly clear. Local Government Officials are as clueless and oblivious to manmade weather reality, than the rest of the population is.
Having dealt extensively with controlled opposition and disinformation over the last 20 years, it’s pretty clear to me when someone is lying to cover-up the reality of manmade weather events, and when someone genuinely doesn’t know the process exists at all. The 38-year-old newly elected mayor of Puerto Rico, is most definitely a member of the latter category.
The same goes for the man who inherited control of dilapidated Puerto Rico Power Grid.
It’s vey clear that neither of these men understands how or why this corrupted power entity could go broke while charging five times the going rates, nor do they even seem aware that massive daily Water Vapor Generation that covers the entire island is being produced by these power plants – that aren’t even providing power to 80% of the population.
Once again, this is prime example of this operation can exist in front of everyone on such a grand scale, while the population remains oblivious.
Just as the citizen population can’t see past the boundaries of their own lives (and think their Universe is the “whole” Universe), so do the politicians that are equally at the mercy of this massive operation.
Clearly the mayor thinks the ‘government’ and ‘bureaucracy’ aspects of the problem he faces, are the ‘entirety’ of the situation, while in reality they are really only distractions keeping him mired in nonsense and minutia which keeps him from recognizing the REAL clear and present threat that is DELIBERATELY keeping his island in a state of disaster and disarray.
Once again, this shows how nothing ever gets accomplished or understood.
Keeping the citizens believing that all of their government officials are “in on it,” while the local officials are convinced citizens questioning these events are “tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists,” keeps the people divided and keeps all sides ignorant of the glairing reality.
Once again this illustrates this massive global operation to hoodwink the population exists well outside of ‘government’ in ANY country, and how desperately the gap between officials and citizens is the number one impediment in the general collective understanding required to expose these continuous attacks.
Watch this COMPELLING video via WeatherWar101:
I need your help in order to keep this small, independent media site going and sharing information with you 365 days/year because of the increasing censorship and ‘on purpose’ ad demonization. If you like my work and you can assist me, my Patreon account allows for a small monthly pledge (here) or you can support this work with a small donation via Paypal (here). THANK YOU for your concern. – Julie Telgenhoff, Creator of A Sheep No More
Natural News| Software billionaire Bill Gates, the world’s wealthiest globalist, is funding research into male birth control through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Although the international husband-and-wife charity that targets healthcare, family planning and poverty spends massively on a wide range of female contraception methods to prevent unintended pregnancies, the Microsoft founder’s organization devotes some resources ($600,000 in 2016) to the male equivalent.
The New York Times reported in November that the Gates Foundation “has donated more than $1 billion for family planning efforts and will spend about $180 million more this year” as part of its goal of providing birth control access to 120 million additional women pursuant to the Family Planning 2020 campaign, a United Nations-allied, public-private global partnership.
India recently cut ties with the vaccine-pushing Gates Foundation over an alleged conflict of interest with Big Pharma. The issue apparently revolved around dangerous HPV vaccines that reportedly bring with them extreme side effects.
In a 2010 Ted Talk, Bill Gates stated,
“The world today has 6.8 billion people… that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
Gates apparently never explained how vaccines in and of themselves would play a role in population reduction, however.
In their annual open letter to Gates Foundation endower and fellow billionaire Warren Buffett, Bill and Melinda don’t mention male contraceptives, but Bill does assert, “Like vaccines, contraceptives are one of the greatest lifesaving innovations in history.”
The organization is on record as saying that contraception is one of the most effective ways to lift families out of poverty in developing nations while reducing childhood mortality.
“This link between saving lives, a lower birthrate, and ending poverty was the most important early lesson Melinda and I learned about global health,” Bill Gates writes in the 14 February 2017, Buffett letter.
Last month, Bill Gates expressed criticism over President Trump’s decision to defund international abortion efforts through Planned Parenthood and other similar groups. The Trump executive order reversing an Obama policy merely prevents taxpayer dollars from being used to pay for abortion procedures and promotion overseas, and has no effect on what private entities such as the Gates Foundation do with their money, however.
According to the MIT Technology Review, the Baylor College of Medicine is one of the Gates-backed facilities that has rebooted efforts to develop a male birth control technique in the form of “an easy-to-take pill that’s safe, fast-acting, and reversible.”
Baylor’s Martin Matzuk is using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) genetic-engineering biotechnology to delete mouse genes that are active in the testes one by one, the MIT publication explains:
“These mice are allowed to mate, and if their female partners don’t get pregnant after three to six months, it means the gene might be a target for a contraceptive. … His next step, he says, will be a novel screening approach to test whether any of about two billion chemicals can disable these genes in a test tube. Promising chemicals could then be fed to male mice to see if they cause infertility.”
Researchers at the University of Georgia, another Gates-funded institution, are testing contraceptive drugs on human stem cells “that look and act like the sperm-making factory cells in the testes.”
In 2012, Natural News founder Mike Adams nicknamed Bill Gates the Sperminator because of his alleged obsession with destroying human sperm and depopulating the planet.
According to a 2015 article in Natural News, the Gates Foundation likes to cover all its bases. It donated at least $26 million to the Clinton Foundation, Bill and Hillary’s alleged money laundering, pay-for-play operation that collected big bucks from foreign governments and multinational corporations while Hillary, the failed 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, was U.S. secretary of state.
Natural News| Just days after the release of a jaw-dropping video lecture called the Science Agenda to Exterminate Blacks, a bombshell science paper has emerged that confirms the use of covert sterilization chemicals in World Health Organization vaccines deployed in Africa. Entitled, “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World,” the paper documents the covert deployment of an infertility chemical in vaccines that are administered to young black women in Kenya:
Oller, J.W., Shaw, C.A., Tomljenovic, L., Karanja, S.K., Ngare, W., Clement, F.M. and Pillette, J.R. (2017), HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World. Open Access Library Journal, 4: e3937.
The paper confirms exactly what Natural News reported earlier in the week: That a covert depopulation program is being run by the World Health Organization, targeting Africans for extermination via infertility chemicals administered under the guise of “vaccines.”
These vaccines, notably, contain chemicals that are administered without the informed consent of the women being injected. In fact, the women are deliberately lied to and told the injections are meant to “protect your health.” But the real reason for the shots is to exterminate blacks in the name of “science” and “medicine.”
I’ve detailed all this in this powerful one-hour lecture that’s already getting rave reviews across the ‘net. Watch the full lecture below, and visit Eugenics.news for more coverage of race-targeted extermination efforts being waged today under the banners of “science” and “medicine.”
The NaturalNews Network is a non-profit collection of public education websites covering topics that empower individuals to make positive changes in their health, environmental sensitivity, consumer choices and informed skepticism. The NaturalNews Network operates without a profit incentive, and its key writer, Mike Adams, receives absolutely no payment for his time, articles or books. The NaturalNews Network is not for sale, and does not accept money to cover any story (or to spike it). NaturalNews Network is what the news industry used to be, before it sold out to big business.
A solid analysis of all this comes from Jafferey Jaxen writing for GreenMedInfo. That story, republished here with credit, is entitled, “CAUGHT: WHO’s Anti-fertility Vaccination Program Chronicled In New Paper.”
Has the World Health Organization (WHO) been purposely misleading women in developing countries into thinking they are protecting them and their future children from tetanus while in fact robbing women of their fertility and the very children they wanted to protect?
A highly concerning new paper has been published in The Open Access Library Journal titled, “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World.” The implications of the information contained within this paper, if true, have the potential to shift paradigms and threaten the hegemony of global organizations who are ostensibly concerned about the health and welfare of the world’s populations. What findings can threaten to do such a thing?
To understand the full breadth of the findings, it is first important to know some key historical facts. The World Health Organization was established in 1945 and immediately embraced the tenet of family planning, which was later referred to as “planned parenthood as a necessity for world health.”
Around 1972, the WHO research program for developing a birth-control vaccinecommenced. The WHO birth-control vaccine involved linking the tetanus toxoid (TT) with the beta portion of the human pregnancy hormone chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). This combination directs the immune system to produce antibodies not only against TT but also against hCG, causing miscarriages in already pregnant recipients and infertility in those not yet pregnant. The results were announced and celebrated by WHO researchers as the first “anti-fertility” vaccine in 1976 during a meeting of the US National Academy of Sciences.
Around the same time, the US National Security Study Memorandum 200, also known as the Kissinger Report, became official US policy in 1975, calling for reducing the population grown in “less developed countries” to near zero by means of “reducing fertility.”
This video describes the chemical and biological methods used covertly by the depopulation lobby to undermine human fertility, as well as the psychosocial and economic methods imposed on the world’s people to subvert the family structure.
By this double pronged approach the global population is being forced into an unnatural process of decline with dire consequences on human health and irreversible damage to the intellectual and genetic endowment of humanity.
This socially engineered genocide is happening with the full knowledge and consent of religious authorities the world over, including the Catholic Church.
Via Kevin Galilee:
I need your help in order to keep this small, independent media site going and sharing information with you 365 days/year because of the increasing censorship and ‘on purpose’ demonization. If you see any value in my work and feel you can trust me to give you the truth as I see it, please consider supporting me. My Patreon account allows for a small monthly pledge (here) or you can support this work with a small donation via Paypal (here). THANK YOU for your concern and support. – A Sheep No More
Speaking at a gala event in London, the Duke of Cambridge said a rapidly increasing population is putting “enormous pressure” on animal species. As royal patron of the Tusk Trust, he told the dinner on Thursday night that there is an urgent need for a strategy that will allow humans and animal species to share the environment.
“In my lifetime, we have seen global wildlife populations decline by over half,” he said. “We are going to have to work much harder, and think much deeper, if we are to ensure that human beings and the other species of animal with which we share this planet can continue to co-exist.
“Africa’s rapidly growing human population is predicted to more than double by 2050 – a staggering increase of three and a half million people per month. There is no question that this increase puts wildlife and habitat under enormous pressure. Urbanization, infrastructure development, cultivation – all good things in themselves, but they will have a terrible impact unless we begin to plan and to take measures now.”
He added that overgrazing and poor water supplies will have a “catastrophic effect” on animal species if new measures to tackle the challenge fail to be implemented. His calls echoed those of his grandfather, the Duke of Edinburgh, who in 2011 suggested a policy of “voluntary family limitation” to tackle overpopulation, which he billed as the biggest challenge in conservation.
Prince William also took the chance to speak out against the disastrous effects of illegal animal trade on both wildlife and people. “It is barbaric, it destroys livelihoods and communities, and it supports organized crime,” he said. “The world is a worse place for it, and we must stamp it out.”
Pope Francis has called for a meeting of world leaders and religious figure heads to discuss advancing New World Order policies such as population reduction and a one-world government.
The Pontifical Academy of Science (PAS) announced the conference has been scheduled to be held November 2-4 at the Vatican.PAS claims the meeting has been arranged to discuss a range of topics aimed at tackling “climate change” and “our responsibility” for the planet by brainstorming ways of reducing the world’s population.
The meeting has been title: “Health of People, Health of Planet and Our Responsibility: Climate Change, Air Pollution, and Health”.A look at the attendees set to sit on the panel shows major advocates of a one world government, single bank and global currency, and proponents of depopulation and single child family policies.
The conference’s title obscures the questionable personal ideologies and professional objectives of a number of its slated participants.
John Schellnhuber is founding director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and chair of the German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU). He is considered one of the world’s leading climate scientists and one of the strongest advocates of the theory that the earth is undergoing catastrophic global warming.
Schellnhuber is also known for his advocacy of a one-world government. In order to avoid his catastrophic predictions for unchecked climate change, Schellnhuber proposes the need for indispensable forms of world governance – or in his own words, a “global democratic society” – to be organized within the framework of the United Nations. Schellnhuber says in his 2013 article “Expanding the Democracy Universe” that “global democracy might be organized around three core activities, namely (i) an Earth Constitution; (ii) a Global Council; and (iii) a Planetary Court.”
Schellnhuber has little patience for those who do not accept his scientific theories and conclusions. In a May 2014 interview with musician Pierre Baigorry, Schellnhuber claimed that sometimes politicians have to take citizens to task “with coercion” to overcome their own resistance to change.
Dasgupta is a proponent of population control, lauding China’s Human Development Index despite that country’s brutal “family planning” policy. He is also a patron of Population Matters, formerly known as the Optimum Population Trust, that lobbies for a “sustainable population size,” including the “reversing of population growth” in many countries.
Dasgupta said, “We need to unravel the processes that led to the ills we are now facing. That is why the Vatican symposia involve natural and social scientists, as well as scholars from the humanities. That the symposia are being held at the Papal Academy is also symbolic. It shows that the ancient hostility between science and the church, at least on the issue of preserving Earth’s services, has been quelled.”
Peter Raven is a biologist who specializes in plants, butterflies, and evolution. At the last PAS symposium, Raven said, “We need at some point to have a limited number of people, which is why Pope Francis and his three most recent predecessors have always argued that you should not have more children than you can bring up properly.”
Raven was incorrect to claim that the three popes before Pope Francis agree with him on the “need at some point to have a limited number of people” so they can be raised “properly”.
Columbia University’s Jeffery Sachs, who co-hosted the Vatican’s 2015 conference on climate change, believes that abortion is a legitimate way to reduce the population.
Sachs made a plea for legalizing abortion as a cost-effective way to eliminate “unwanted children” when contraception fails in his 2008 book Commonwealth: Economics for a Crowded Planet.
He describes abortion as a “lower-risk and lower-cost option” than bringing a new human life to the world.
He also wrote that the “legalization of abortion reduces a country’s total fertility rate significantly, by as much as half a child on average,” and criticized former U.S. Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush for denying groups that provide and promote abortion any U.S. funding through the Mexico City Policy.
Sachs is listed as an author of the background note to a declaration adopted by scientists and religious leaders at the 2015 Vatican conference that validated the theory that human activity is changing the Earth’s climate. Unlike the declaration, the background note with a Vatican emblem at the head speaks of the world’s population as a problem.
A few political figures from the United States will also participate. All hail from California: U.S. Congressman Scott Peters; state Senator Kevin de León, president pro Tempore of the California State Senate; and California Gov. Jerry Brown, who will deliver a keynote address on the closing day of the event.
All three are strong supporters of Planned Parenthood.
Presiding over the event will be the head of the Pontifical Academy of Science, Archbishop Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo.
Sorondo has an anti-capitalist worldview and is opposed to traditional Church doctrine.
Sorondo’s connection to population control elites is clear, not only from his bringing them to the Vatican but also their feting him and having him sit on the Leadership Council of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, an organization launched by then-U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon. On the leadership council, alongside Sorondo, are Sachs and Ted Turner, two of the best-known promoters of coercive population control in the world. Turner held an event at the posh Harvard Club in New York City to celebrate Sorondo’s work on Sept. 25, 2015.
At the Biological Extinction Symposium, the Archbishop’s confounding statements regarding procreation were disconnected from Church principles. He said, “Many times, we don’t know exactly what is the doctrine of the Church.”
The last few PAS conferences have caused pro-life critics to point out that no strong orthodox Catholic voices have been present, and so views antithetical to church doctrine have been categorically asserted without anyone presenting Catholic corrections to their statements.
At one, Archbishop Sorondo himself promoted reducing family sizes, saying that “when you have education” women will only have one or two children instead of seven.
One of the conference experts replied that “without having access to birth control, she will have more children than she wants.” “And that’s why it is not just education alone, it is a combination of education and birth control that brings fertility down.”
Nobody present at the conference contradicted him.