Domestic Terrorists

Agenda 21: The BLM Land Grabbing Endgame

August 10, 2017 By Sheep Media

Why is the federal government so obsessed with grabbing more land? After all, the federal government already owns more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S. states.

Why are federal bureaucrats so determined to grab even more? Well, the truth is that this all becomes much clearer once you understand that there is a very twisted philosophy behind what they are doing.

It is commonly known as “Agenda 21”, although many names and labels are used for this particular philosophy. Basically, those that hold to this form of radical environmentalism believe that humanity is utterly destroying the planet, and therefore the goal should be to create a world where literally everything that we do is tightly monitored and controlled by control freak bureaucrats in the name of “sustainable development”.

In their vision of the future, the human population will be greatly reduced and human activity will be limited to strictly regulated urban areas and travel corridors. The rest of the planet will be left to nature.

To achieve this goal, a massive transfer of land from private landowners to the federal government will be necessary.

So the conflict between Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and the BLM is really just the tip of the iceberg. The reality is that the BLM has their eyes on much bigger prizes.

For example, Breitbart is reporting that the BLM is looking at grabbing 90,000 privately-held acres along the Texas/Oklahoma border…

After the recent Bundy Ranch episode by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Texans are becoming more concerned about the BLM’s focus on 90,000 acres along a 116 mile stretch of the Texas/Oklahoma boundary. The BLM is reviewing the possible federal takeover and ownership of privately-held lands which have been deeded property for generations of Texas landowners.

Sid Miller, former Texas State Representative and Republican candidate for Texas Agriculture Commissioner, has since made the matter a campaign issue to Breitbart Texas.

“In Texas,” Miller says, “the BLM is attempting a repeat of an action taken over 30 years ago along the Red River when Tommy Henderson lost a federal lawsuit. The Bureau of Land Management took 140 acres of his property and didn’t pay him one cent.”

Needless to say, officials down in Texas are not pleased about this. In fact, just check out what the attorney general of Texas is saying…

Gen. Abbott sent a strongly-worded letter to BLM Director Neil Kornze, asking for answers to a series of questions related to the potential land grab.

“I am deeply concerned about the notion that the Bureau of Land Management believes the federal government has the authority to swoop in and take land that has been owned and cultivated by Texas landowners for generations,” General Abbott wrote. “The BLM’s newly asserted claims to land along the Red River threaten to upset long-settled private property rights and undermine fundamental principles—including the rule of law—that form the foundation of our democracy. Yet, the BLM has failed to disclose either its full intentions or the legal justification for its proposed actions. Decisions of this magnitude must not be made inside a bureaucratic black box.”

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart Texas, General Abbott said, “This is the latest line of attack by the Obama Administration where it seems like they have a complete disregard for the rule of law in this country …And now they’ve crossed the line quite literally by coming into the State of Texas and trying to claim Texas land as federal land. And, as the Attorney General of Texas I am not going to allow this.”

Does the federal government actually need more land?

As I mentioned above, the feds already own more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S. states…

Nevada: 84.5 percent
Alaska: 69.1 percent
Utah: 57.4 percent
Oregon: 53.1 percent
Idaho: 50.2 percent
Arizona: 48.1 percent
California: 45.3 percent
Wyoming: 42.4 percent
New Mexico: 41.8 percent

The federal government does not need more land. But there is an obsession to grab more so that the dictates of Agenda 21 can be implemented.

Pages: 1 2

14 People “Allegedly” Killed in California Mass Shooting: Suspects on Loose; Militarized Police; Obama Calls For “GUN” Reform

December 2, 2015 By Sheep Media

Well, the “controlled” mainstream media” is reporting another mass shooting this time in San Bernardino, California. The shooting “supposedly” occurred at the Inland Regional Center, a facility for people with developmental disabilities in San Bernardino, California.

Wednesday’s San Bernardino, California, shooting occurred at the Inland Regional Center, a facility for people with developmental disabilities. Image Credit: FOX6

Per the LA Times’ Facebook page, it is being reported that for the past YEAR there has been on-going active shooting “DRILLS” at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, CA …the area where the latest “alleged” mass shooting is being announced. (emphasis on “DRILLS” stressed on the MSM news). See here: https://www.facebook.com/latimes/videos/vb.5863113009/10153840072283010/?type=2&permPage=1

“What we know so far about the shooting. Our paywall has been lifted on all SanBernardino coverage.” Photo Credit: Los Angeles Times’ Facebook page

Per CNN:

The hunt for one to three suspects was taking place near a San Bernardino, California, center for people with developmental disabilities, where at least 14 people were killed Wednesday, Police Chief Jarrod Burguan told reporters.

Fourteen other people were wounded in the shooting, Burguan said.

• The suspects were armed with long guns, Burguan told reporters. “These were people that came prepared. … They were armed with long guns, not hand guns,” he told reporters. Most of the victims were “centrally located in one area of the facility,” Burguan said. Police didn’t exchange gunfire with the shooters, he added.

• “At this point, I know one of your questions is going to be ‘Is this a terrorist incident?’ I will tell you right now we do not know if this is a terrorist incident,” David Bowdich, an assistant director for Los Angeles FBI’s office told reporters.

• The shootings were in the conference center at the Inland Regional Center, the center’s executive director, Lavinia Johnson, told CNN. She believes the county’s Department of Public Health was having a holiday party there. Johnson said the fire alarm went off in her building, and people began to evacuate but then the order came to stay in place. Later police came and took people out of their offices.

SWAT teams and the bomb squad were working to clear the buildings where the shootings took place.

A SWAT vehicle carries heavily armed officers; Image Credit: CNN

The three suspects are believed to be armed with AK-47-type weapons, a local law enforcement official told CNN.

• President Barack Obama restated his call for more gun control reforms in the wake of the mass shooting. Speaking to CBS News, Obama said Congress should act in a bipartisan manner to close loopholes, including one that allows people on the TSA no-fly list to legally purchase firearms

****

The bomb squad found a suspicious package on the second floor of a building and determined it is “not normal,” a law enforcement source told CNN. They are going to handle it with a robot, the source added.

• A woman who works at a building where the shootings occurred texted her father: “Shooting at my work. People shot.” The father told CNN affiliate KABC his daughter told him 10 to 20 people were shot.

• The FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives were responding, agency representatives said.

• Wednesday’s shooting occurred at the Inland Regional Center, a facility for people with developmental disabilities. It is unclear how many people were at the facility at the time of the shooting.

Police escort people away. Image Credit: CNN

The center’s Facebook page says it employs nearly 670 people at its facilities in San Bernardino and Riverside counties, providing service to more than 30,200 people.

It aims to “work on a personal, one-on-one basis with people with developmental disabilities to make their lives better as they define it.” No information is yet available on how many people were at the facility at the time of the shooting.

• San Bernardino is a city of just over 200,000 people 60 miles east of Los Angeles.

Read more at CNN here.

UPDATE from A Sheep No More: Per CNN corporate-controlled news, the “alleged” suspects are down (2 dead, one male/female), one officer wounded, suspects carrying AR-15-type “assault” weapons, hand guns and pipe bombs, area is on lock down (soft martial law) and the mainstream media talking head’s emphasis is on the fact that these suspects could be “DOMESTIC TERRORISTS.” Could YOU be deemed a “potential domestic terrorist” per your own government? Check it out below!

REVEALED: Government Documents Expose FEMA Detainment Center List Criteria for “Potential Domestic Terrorists”

Per Big Brother, “Potential Domestic Terrorists”

Will you SURVIVE being sent to a “Detention Center” (FEMA) if deemed a “potential domestic terrorist” per government?

12/3/15 UPDATE: Well it seems that per the mainstream media, the narrative of the “alleged” now deceased shooters is switching to being “RADICAL ISLAMISTS” terrorists. To take that one step further, I, who does not have my notification on facebook set to receive Alex Jones’ posts, actually received that notification as he and his cult are purporting that this is a gun grab (true) by use of these “True Radical Islamist” vs the jews. Those in the know understand how Zionism has affected the jewish population using their religion as it’s guise. In reality, Zionism is a very dangerous political ideology that cares not for jew or goyim ….but Alex knows best. Here is his current rant on his Facebook page (video): https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEmerickJones/videos/vb.6499393458/10153751371908459/?type=2&theater¬if_t=live_video

Lastly …remember Albert Pike’s letter to Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871.

NOTE: this is not a direct quote from the letter, but pretty much sums up the upcoming holy wars. You can read the letter in its entire here.

SHOCKING! MSM Openly Discussing FEMA Camps For ‘Radical’ U.S. Citizens!

July 18, 2015 By Sheep Media

VIA| Former U.S. General Wesley Clark recently talked about bringing back WWII-style U.S. internment camps. But this time, instead of rounding up Japanese-Americans, the victims would be Muslims and ANY DOMESTIC political dissident that the government deems “RADICAL.”

That would include the tens of thousands of U.S. citizens who have been placed on terror watch lists and the infamous FBI “No Fly List” who have never been convicted of any crime, and in most cases have never been arrested or questioned.

This interview took place with Digby, the pseudonym of liberal political blogger Heather Parton (known also as Heather Digby Parton) from Santa Monica, California who founded the blog Hullabaloo.

She has has come out and reaffirmed that this was exactly what Clark said, and is not being taken out of context in any way whatsoever.

Digby writes:

Yes, Wesley Clark really said what I said he said folks

I have always liked Clark. And he said some reasonable stuff in his interview with Thomas Roberts this morning before he said the following.

Roberts asked him what we needed to do about “self-radicalization” which seems to be the short-hand for a Muslim (as opposed to a white supremacist or a conspiracy theorist or just some nut) who reads some crazy stuff on the internet and decides to go out in a blaze of glory:

Clark: We have got to identify the people who are most likely to be radicalized. We’ve got to cut this off at the beginning. There are always a certain number of young people who are alienated. They don’t get a job, they lost a girlfriend, their family doesn’t feel happy here and we can watch the signs of that. And there are members of the community who can reach out to those people and bring them back in and encourage them to look at their blessings here.

But I do think on a national policy level we need to look at what self-radicalization means because we are at war with this group of terrorists. They do have an ideology. In World War II if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war.

So, if these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States, as a matter of principle fine. It’s their right and it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict. And I think we’re going to have to increasingly get tough on this, not only in the United States but our allied nations like Britain, Germany and France are going to have to look at their domestic law procedures.

People are arguing with me on twitter that he couldn’t have said this, but he did. If you still don’t believe me go watch the tape yourself.

That’s good advice. Watch the video below and help SPREAD THE WORD. It has happened here and it very well might again if we don’t SPEAK UP and SPEAK OUT!

(Article by M. David)

9 Killed in Mass Shooting That’s Already Fanning Race Wars & Gun Grab Talk

June 18, 2015 By Sheep Media

Editor’s Note: I turned on the TV while this story was breaking about a mass shooting in a Charleston, SC church and captured an interview that a CNN talking head had with one of the shooting victim’s brother. I will quote their conversation below:

Talking head to victim’s brother: “…the president talked about the need for a conversation about guns in our society. Do you agree with that statement from the president? Do you think our country needs a gun conversation?”

Shooting victims brother’s reply: “We’ve been here before …whether it’s a movie theatre or a classroom or a church, gun violence has again, plagued our country. And every time this happens, we have a national conversation for about 2 or 3 days and then we go onto something else. I think the president is right. I think it’s time we really have a conversation about guns in America and a conversation about mental health … “

BREAKING Story Below.

Via The Daily Sheeple:

This is Powerful. Local pastors, collectively are seen praying down the street from shooting scene. #Charleston pic.twitter.com/44TnFh1xZq

— Pranaav Jadhav (@pranaavj) June 18, 2015

Already being hailed in the media as a “hate crime,” it’s being reported that a white gunman walked into Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, one of the nation’s oldest black congregations, during a prayer meeting tonight just after 9pm and opened fire, killing eight people and wounding two others. One of the two died later at the hospital.

Among the dead is State Senator and Rev. Clements Pinckney, the church’s pastor. The news was confirmed by Al Sharpton:

Rev. Clements Pinckney, a SC legislator is among the 9 killed in SC church. I am reminded that he helped lead our prayer vigil for Scott.

— Reverend Al Sharpton (@TheRevAl) June 18, 2015

Shortly after the shooting, reporters and others were kept away from the scene on the claim there was a bomb threat near the church. That threat has since been given the all clear.

The gunman is still at large and a manhunt is currently underway. Description of the shooter from the Charleston Police Department:

Suspect in shooting on Calhoun St is a w/m approx 21 slender small build wearing a grey sweat shirt blue jeans timberland boots clean shaven

— Charleston P.D. (@CharlestonPD) June 18, 2015

Reuters is reporting, “The shooting called to mind a 1963 bombing of an African-American church in Birmingham, Alabama, that killed four girls and galvanized the civil rights movement of the 1960s. The Charleston church is one of the largest and oldest black congregations in the South, its website says.”

UPDATE Via A Sheep No More:

Rothschild’s Reuters Latest Headline reads: WHITE suspect arrested in killing of nine at BLACK U.S. church

(NOTE: when I went back to double check Reuter’s article, they had already made some changes to it by adding some additional verbiage and really digging into the horrific treatment of blacks in the past. I personally do not judge a fellow human on race, religion, their sex, sexual orientation, etc etc so I’m not going to feed into the mainstream medias motive here. I do recognize how blacks were barbarically brutalized in the past, and I am hoping that we’ve evolved by now. I can’t name one friend of mine who is racist …period. The MSM news, in bed with Washington, is stirring things up because they can see that we are uniting as humans with a soul intact and figuring out the real enemy …them. Below, I added a couple of paragraphs, but did not italicize the additions that Reuter’s made to the article only one hour later). UPDATE 6/19/15: The entire article has been changed to fit whatever the Rothschild’s Reuter, also owning Associated Press (AP), desire it be which included adding in the old Sandy Hook false flag. That will assist in their agenda to disarm Americans and do away with the 2nd amendment ..a RIGHT to the people of the US. The mainstream media news is controlled opposition.

The article goes on to say:

“A 21-year-old white man suspected of killing nine people at a historic African-American church in Charleston, South Carolina was arrested on Thursday after an attack that the United States is investigating as a hate crime.

Law enforcement officials arrested alleged gunman Dylann Roof after a traffic stop in Shelby, North Carolina, about 220 miles (350 km) north of Charleston, said police chief Gregory Mullen.

….

Wednesday’s mass shooting, which occurred after the suspect had sat with parishioners at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church for an hour, follows months of protests over killings of black men which have shaken the United States.

In a Facebook profile apparently belonging to Roof, a portrait showed him wearing a jacket emblazoned with the flags of apartheid-era South Africa and of the former Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe, both formerly ruled by white minorities.

….

The mass shooting on Wednesday followed months of racially charged protests over killings of black men which have shaken the United States.

U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch said her office was investigating whether to charge Roof with a hate crime motivated by racial or other prejudice. Such crimes typically carry harsher penalties.

“The fact that this took place in a black church obviously raises questions about a dark part of our history,” U.S. President Barack Obama told reporters. “We don’t have all the facts but we know that, once again, innocent people were killed in part because someone who wanted to inflict harm had no trouble getting their hands on a gun.”

…….

The Southern Poverty Law Center, which researches U.S. hate groups, said the attack illustrates the dangers that home-grown extremists pose.

“Since 9/11, our country has been fixated on the threat of Jihadi terrorism. But the horrific tragedy at the Emanuel AME reminds us that the threat of homegrown domestic terrorism is very real,” the group said in a statement, referring to the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.”

You can read more on this mass shooting here, but please take notice of the control mechanisms being reported here: Divide and Conquer/Rule in hopes of the Hegelian Dialectic (Problem, Reaction, Solution)

The race wars. MSM already reporting this to be a white US slave vs black US slave hate crime in this darwinian, hierarchal, genocidal master/slave system of control called government instead of the entire country of humans united against this rogue Corporation government. Oligarchies remain in power by pitting the good people against one another.
Utilizing one of the largest instigators of hate bait, division and propaganda, The Southern Poverty Law Center, to make sure to mention how horrific, large and threatening these hate groups are becoming in America. This propaganda tool is reporting that “Home-Grown Extremists” are more of a threat to the US people than this US government funded ISIS creation. You can always count on the SPLC to stir up the masses and create the division and distraction that is necessary when a government has gone wild and needs the people divided and distracted. Oh look, it worked SPLC, the DOJ is launching a “hate crime” probe in the Charleston shooting. Don’t take this lighting because here is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents.
And finally, the very need for a gun grab and therefore a mass shooting to which we will continue to hear not only the US state-run news, but POTUS and the victim’s friends and families attempting to use repetition about the gun conversation which is code for “gun control.” Read all the other gun grabbing activity from the past here.

Congress Passes Bill That Gives Police Unlimited Access to Citizens’ Private Communications

December 13, 2014 By Sheep Media

Editor’s Note: I’m proud to be an American. OMG nothing could be further from the truth. The amount of ignorance due to the subjugation of the public’s mind is beyond my belief. The mind control, brainwashing, inept public indoctrination centers, controlled mainstream media (MSM), satanic music and movie industry, debauched medical institutions, 501C3 tax exempt churches in bed with the government (no separation of church and state PSYOP), out of control, lying and cheating corporation government (Latin for MIND CONTROL) and those political whores …let’s just say that pretty much EVERY institution in the FAKE “Land of the Free” has been completely infiltrated and corrupted and still the majority of Americans are in complete denial.

Congress Passes Bill That Gives Police Unlimited Access to Citizens’ Private Communications Article Below:

Congress has just passed the Intelligence Authorization Act for 2015, which grants the executive branch not only the ability to spy on American Citizens private communications, but also the legal authority to turn that information over to local law enforcement.

All of this can be done without any court order being granted, all in the name of “fighting terror”, of course. (SEE: “War On Terror” Is A Fraud & Not Meant To Be Won …Forever WARS!!! )

The legislation was scheduled to be held as a “voice vote,” which means that it “passed” and no record is kept on the voting.

Such an ethical government and Americans still believe they are helpless and cannot govern themselves by their innate “Moral Code” and “Natural Law“. They continue to need and actually desire to be ruled by the psychopathic privileged few and their minions. Therefore, they and all future generations will always be slaves to a very, very soon to be “satanic, totalitarian police state lockdown”.

At least they still like to complain about it, but unfortunately very soon they won’t even be able to do that; if the thought is in their head, they’ll be accused of a “thought crime“. The founding fathers would be so very ashamed. (SEE: Scary Proof Something’s About To Happen)

Rep Justin Amash (R-MI), after discovering this sneak attack, went to the House floor and demanded a roll call vote so that representatives would have their vote recorded.

The fact that this important piece of legislation was handled in this way indicates that this was done intentionally to sneak it past the public eye.

It becomes even more suspicious when you realize that it was done concurrently with the CIA torture report being released and the Gruber hearing.

SEE: Americans can LEGALLY be ASSASSINATED by their own government

It seems clear there was an effort made to slip the vote by without having to answer to the American people, as Congress is well aware that Americans do not want to be spied upon by their government after the revelations by Edward Snowden. (ha ha …ya think??)

Congressman Justin Amash stated that when he learned this bill was:

“being rushed to the floor for a vote …I asked my legislative staff to quickly review the bill for unusual language.”

What he says next should raise red flags for every American citizen.

He claims what his staff discovered was:

“One of the most egregious sections of law I’ve encountered during my time as a representative: It grants the executive branch virtually unlimited access to the communications of every American.”

The bill in question is H.R. 4681. (Sec. 309)

Rep. Amash wrote a last minute letter to all of his colleagues in Congress to implore them to vote “NO” on H.R. 4681.

Here is the text of that letter:

Dear Colleague:

The intelligence reauthorization bill, which the House will vote on today, contains a troubling new provision that for the first time statutorily authorizes spying on U.S. citizens without legal process.

Last night, the Senate passed an amended version of the intelligence reauthorization bill with a new Sec. 309—one the House never has considered. Sec. 309 authorizes “the acquisition, retention, and dissemination” of nonpublic communications, including those to and from U.S. persons. The section contemplates that those private communications of Americans, obtained without a court order, may be transferred to domestic law enforcement for criminal investigations.

To be clear, Sec. 309 provides the first statutory authority for the acquisition, retention, and dissemination of U.S. persons’ private communications obtained without legal process such as a court order or a subpoena. The administration currently may conduct such surveillance under a claim of executive authority, such as E.O. 12333. However, Congress never has approved of using executive authority in that way to capture and use Americans’ private telephone records, electronic communications, or cloud data.

Supporters of Sec. 309 claim that the provision actually reins in the executive branch’s power to retain Americans’ private communications. It is true that Sec. 309 includes exceedingly weak limits on the executive’s retention of Americans’ communications. With many exceptions, the provision requires the executive to dispose of Americans’ communications within five years of acquiring them—although, as HPSCI admits, the executive branch already follows procedures along these lines.

In exchange for the data retention requirements that the executive already follows, Sec. 309 provides a novel statutory basis for the executive branch’s capture and use of Americans’ private communications. The Senate inserted the provision into the intelligence reauthorization bill late last night. That is no way for Congress to address the sensitive, private information of our constituents—especially when we are asked to expand our government’s surveillance powers.

I urge you to join me in voting “no” on H.R. 4681, the intelligence reauthorization bill, when it comes before the House today.
/s/

Justin Amash
Member of Congress

This bill will allow information gained from domestic spying by the feds, in the name of “terrorism,” to be transferred to local law enforcement for criminal investigations without any type of court order, subpoena or warrant.

This is one of the most drastic changes in U.S. law in our lifetimes and has the potential to turn the U.S. into a true POLICE STATE.

SEE: The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Explained in 3 Minutes

When the feds take what is claimed to be a means of fighting “terrorism” and use it as means of forwarding criminal prosecutions against American citizens, without any court order or warrant, we are on the brink of total tyranny.

SEE: Government Agents ‘Directly Involved’ in Most High-Profile US TERROR Plots

We urge everyone to call their Representative and let them know that you do not support H.R. 4681… tell them NO new domestic spying powers!!

Please help get the word out and share this information with your fellow Americans!

Find Your Representative HERE.

Source: thefreethoughtproject.com

A Second American Revolution Is Now Inevitable

June 16, 2014 By Sheep Media

Brandon Smith / alt-market.net

“Stand your ground. Don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here.” – Militia Captain John Parker at the Battle Of Lexington

During the first weekend of June, two armed assailants, a married couple purported by the mainstream media to be “white supremacists” and “conspiracy theorists,” ambushed two police officers at a CiCi’s Pizza in Las Vegas, killing the officers after screaming, “This is a revolution!” The suspects then reportedly covered one officer’s body with a Gadsden Don’t Tread On Me flag and then fled to a Walmart, where they killed another man with a CCW who attempted to reason with them, then committed suicide. Yes, it reads like a Southern Poverty Law Center fantasy story; and in many ways, it is.

As we all predicted the mainstream media has followed the pattern they have always followed, which is to equate the actions of one or two psychotics with the beliefs and principles of the liberty movement in general.

I remember when Jared Loughner fired into a crowd of people near Tucson, Ariz., killing numerous Federal and State employees; the immediate response by the media was to attempt to tie him to the liberty movement. In the end, he turned out to be a raving leftist.

I remember the Boston Marathon bombing and the automatic reflex by the media to accuse “right-wing extremists” of the crime. So far, we have seen NO hard evidence to implicate anyone specific in that atrocity, including the Tsarnaev brothers. Of all the violent crimes dumped in the lap of the liberty movement over the years, how many have actually been committed or endorsed by the liberty movement? I can’t think of any.

This has not prevented the establishment media from doing everything in their power to associate criminal action with political ideals. Efforts to sully the success of the Bundy Ranch stand-off were swift, with Jared and Amanda Miller’s visit to Bunkerville splashed across the headlines. Luckily, the sound judgement of organizations like Oath Keepers led founder Stewart Rhodes to personally ask the two future shooters to leave the property. I can only imagine the weight of the slander if they had been allowed to stay.

When an activist movement holds the moral high ground against a repressive establishment power structure, the establishment’s primary recourse is to target the character of its principles.

The secondary recourse is direct confrontation. If a dissenting organization is not mindlessly vicious in its methods, then simply make it APPEAR vicious. If it is not hateful in its rhetoric, then artificially tie it to people who are. And if a government really needs to kick-start a crackdown, it can engineer its own man-made calamities and blame the groups that most threaten its authority.

This was achieved to great effect in Europe from the 1950s until the 1990s by the CIA working in tandem with multiple European governments under a covert project called Operation Gladio.

Gladio was essentially a secret army of operatives and stooges, handlers and puppets, used to create false-flag terrorist shootings and bombings across Europe that were blamed on “left-wing extremists.”

In reality, NATO alphabet agencies were behind the entire facade. The goal was to terrorize the citizenry through a nonstop campaign of indiscriminate death, blamed on a convenient scapegoat, so that individuals would hand over more freedom and more power to the central governments. The point is, whether real or staged, I believe such events are going to escalate within the U.S. today on an incredible scale and that, regardless of evidence, they will be blamed on “right-wing extremists.” In case you were wondering, that label will be foisted on most if not all of us.

That said, I think an important truth needs to be stated here: Whether the beliefs of the attackers in Las Vegas were actually liberty movement-oriented or not is ultimately irrelevant. To shoot random police and civilians and then commit suicide is an act of pure insanity, a product of mental instability that has nothing to do with political philosophy, and mental instability trumps belief and association anytime. Mentally unstable people exist within ALL belief systems and political groups.

At bottom, I do not care what their beliefs were. Their actions do not represent the values I hold dear, nor do I think they represent the values most of us hold dear. The shooting is a tragedy, but in the grand scheme of things, it means nothing, and I have little doubt it will be forgotten within weeks.

I relate the story because I do, in fact, agree with one thing: that a “revolution,” a second American Revolution, is inevitable. But I think I speak for the vast majority of the movement when I say that this revolution will not begin with the deaths of innocents or random government employees on our hands, and it certainly won’t begin at the doorstep of a CiCi’s Pizza.

The Bundy ranch incident, which occurred only a short drive from Las Vegas, has been a revelation for many people. Mistakes were made, provocateurs reared their ugly heads, and lessons were learned. But overall, America has been fundamentally changed, even if the average person does not realize it yet. The information war came within a razor’s edge of evolving into a shooting war, with the establishment in retreat, licking its wounds while planning how it can gain back its composure and carefully crafted image of “invincibility”.

What frightens the establishment most, I think, is that the American people have become active participants in their own national environment once again. At Bundy ranch, they stopped asking for mercy, they stopped begging the system to police itself, they stopped waiting for the rigged elections, and they stopped relying on useless legal avenues to effect change. Rather, they took matters into their own hands and changed the situation on the ground on their own. For oligarchy, this development is unacceptable, because one success could lead to many.

Already, we are beginning to hear whispers of possible Federal retribution against those who participated in the confrontation.

This has been cemented within the efforts of a new task force against “domestic terrorism” organized by none other than Eric “Fast and Furious” Holder.

After the recent exposure of Barack Obama’s Department of Defense Directive 3025.18, we now know that since at least 2010, the White House has been setting the stage for the use of military force against “domestic threats.” That is to say, for at least the past four years our government has been quietly maneuvering toward martial law. It’s been happening for much longer if you count George W. Bush’s Presidential Decision Directive 51, which has yet to be fully declassified.

The exposure of Directive 3025.18 also came with information that the Obama Administration considered using it as a way to activate military forces and drones against the Bundy ranch. The burning question is, of course, why didn’t it? The Federal government is not known for its diplomacy in the face of a defiant citizenry. Waco and Ruby Ridge made that clear. I believe that it was not necessarily the people on the ground at Bunkerville, Nev., that they were most worried about. The terrain is admittedly a terrible place to mount a defense against a mechanized horde of jackboots.

No, what the White House feared was a larger response to such an attack. It feared the millions of patriots who would swarm down from all sides if it committed to a Ruby Ridge-style siege. It feared the reality that this time, Americans were not going to sit back and watch another family be slaughtered on national television. It feared the fact that it didn’t have the moral high ground in the public eye and that a kinetic failure on its part would be met with cheers, rather than tears, from much of the populace.

So where does this leave us? With the Bundy success besmirching the Feds, the next strategic program will likely include an unprecedented effort to demonize the liberty movement perhaps to the point of a Gladio-type false-flag campaign, leading to the eventual indefinite detention of activists as domestic security threats.

It’s not going to end with shootings in pizzerias and slobbering hit pieces from the SPLC. Expect a landslide of violent acts. Expect another engineered large-scale calamity like the Oklahoma City Bombing. Expect dozens of Timothy McVeighs to be trotted out in the media. Expect the Liberty Movement’s name to be buried in an avalanche of bullshit. Mark my words; it’s going to get much worse from here on.

And this is where I will add my warning.

Before the Bundy ranch became a possible battleground, I stated in my article “Real Americans Are Ready To Snap” that the liberty movement was going to draw a line in the sand over Bureau of Land Management abuses in Bunkerville, and I was right.

It seems to me that time is growing short. As tyrants become more bold, so too must the citizenry; otherwise, we shrivel up and die. We cannot allow the movement’s momentum to be shattered and driven underground as the militia movement was after Oklahoma City. We know what is coming, and we must drive forward. We know we will be labeled as terrorists and villains, and ultimately, we must realize that such eventualities do not matter. The Liberty Movement is not going away. In fact, future clashes with our criminal government are only going to become more frequent.

The next family threatened, the next activist individual or group arrested or black-bagged without legitimate cause, the next major false flag, the next use of military forces as civil law enforcement, the next unConstitutional misstep, and I have no doubt whatsoever in my mind that a revolt will erupt. It’s not about making grand predictions; it’s about examining the logical odds, and the odds are high.

The knowledge that the establishment is considering using the full force of its military apparatus against the people has not dissuaded anyone. Bundy ranch was a very near miss. I do not expect a peaceful resolution the next time around. I also do not expect the government as it exists now to stop clamoring for more control or less corruption. If recent events have proven anything, they have proven that a second American Revolution is inevitable; and all we can do is ready ourselves.

About the author: Brandon Smith is the founder of the Alternative Market Project, an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for barter and mutual aid. Join www.Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the unstable mainstream system and build something better. You can contact Brandon Smith at: [email protected]

Toddler Critically Burned During SWAT “No Knock” Raid

June 1, 2014 By Sheep Media

Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

A toddler is in a medically induced coma after a Cornelia, Georgia, SWAT team tossed a flash-bang grenade into his crib during the execution of a “no-knock” warrant. The boy’s mother told reporters that he has about a 50-percent chance of survival from the injuries.

Bounkham Phonesavanh is 19 months old and was asleep in his crib when police broke open the front door in the early morning hours Wednesday and threw the grenade into the front room. His mother, father, and three sisters were in the room as well.

“Everyone’s sleeping. There’s a loud bang and a bright light,” the boy’s mother, Alecia Phonesavanh, told local news station WSB-TV. “The cops threw that grenade in the door without looking first, and it landed right in the playpen and exploded on his pillow right in his face.”

Police are defending the actions, calling the critical injuries to the toddler a “tragic accident.”

“The last thing you want is law enforcement to injure someone innocent,” Habersham County Sheriff Joey Terrell told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “There was no malicious act performed. It was a terrible accident that was never supposed to happen.”

Earlier statements from police revealed that they saw no indications that there were children in the house. The mother says that isn’t true.

“They say there were no toys,” Alecia Phonesavanh told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “There is plenty of stuff. Their shoes were laying all over.”

SWAT team members executed the no-knock warrant after receiving a tip from an informant that he had bought methamphetamine from a man named Wanis Thometheva earlier that day. According to the report in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, police learned that the suspected drug dealer was found in possession of a weapon when arrested on a prior drug charge.

“That’s the threat he uses to those who don’t do what he wants,” Sheriff Terrell reportedly told the newspaper.

Thometheva wasn’t present when police entered the house. The Phonesavanh family were there, asleep. They are visiting Georgia only because of fire damage to their home in Wisconsin.

“We have nothing to do with this (drugs),” Bounkham Phonesavanh (the father), told the Atlanta paper.

Upon discovering that the target of the warrant was not at the home, police took notice of the serious injuries to the toddler and began trying to minimize the harm.

Sheriff Terrell told the newspaper that a medic began CPR before the child was transported to Grady Memorial Hospital. The injuries were severe enough for him to have been airlifted to the hospital, but foggy conditions made a helicopter flight “unsafe,” according to the sheriff.

“It blew open his face and his chest,” the boy’s mother, Alecia Phonesavanh, told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution outside Grady Memorial Hospital. “Everybody was asleep. It’s not like anyone was trying to fight.”

While the child fights for his life in the hospital, his parents and sisters have nowhere to live. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that a friend of the family has started an online fundraising page to help them survive until they can return home — with their child, it is hoped.

So-called “no-knock” warrants are becoming increasingly common. In his book Overkill: The Rise of Paramilitary Police Raids in America, Radley Balko reports that more than 40,000 such operations are conducted every year. He also points out that these warrants almost always involve police busting into someone’s home, thus destroying centuries of Anglo-American protections from government abuse of power:

Americans have long maintained that a man’s home is his castle and that he has the right to defend it from unlawful intruders.

Unfortunately, that right may be disappearing.

The court in the English case of Huckle v. Money (1763) expressed the preeminence of the so-called “Castle Doctrine”: “To enter a man’s house by virtue of a nameless warrant, in order to procure evidence, is worse than the Spanish Inquisition; a law under which no Englishman would wish to live an hour.”

In the case of United States v. McConney (1984), the Supreme Court held that “exigent circumstances” could override Fourth Amendment protections of freedom from searches and seizures without a qualifying warrant. According to the McConney ruling, warrants exempt from Fourth Amendment mandates are appropriate in:

those circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of a suspect, or some other consequence [that would] improperly frustrate … legitimate law enforcement efforts.

Balko explained in a 2006 article that those standards are being loosely interpreted by an increasingly militarized police corps:

The tactic is appropriate in a few limited situations, such as when hostages or fugitives are involved, or where the suspect poses an immediate threat to community safety. But increasingly, this highly confrontational tactic is being used in less volatile situations, most commonly to serve routine search warrants for illegal drugs.

He continued:

In the real world, the exigent-circumstances exceptions have been so broadly interpreted since Wilson, they’ve overwhelmed the rule. No-knock raids have been justified on the flimsiest of reasons, including that the suspect was a licensed, registered gun owner (NRA, take note!), or that the mere presence of indoor plumbing could be enough to trigger the “destruction of evidence” exception.

One can reasonably imagine a situation where it would be illogical and contrary to public safety for law enforcement to announce themselves. Breaking into a home at 3 a.m. and throwing flash-bang ordnance in order to possibly find a person who allegedly sold meth to a meth addict being paid by police to give them tips is hardly one of those situations, however.

Balko agrees:

These raids are often launched on tips from notoriously unreliable confidential informants. Rubber-stamp judges, dicey informants, and aggressive policing have thus given rise to the countless examples of “wrong door” raids we read about in the news. In fact, there’s a disturbingly long list of completely innocent people who’ve been killed in “wrong door” raids, including New York City worker Alberta Spruill, Boston minister Accelyne Williams, and a Mexican immigrant in Denver named Ismael Mena.

When the truth comes out, if ever, it could be that this 19-month-old child had his face and chest blown open by a grenade thrown by a cop who just busted in the wrong door. Regardless of how accurate the information the SWAT team received from its “confidential informant,” it will likely be discovered that this exercise of arbitrary and excessive force was carried out by police who were outfitted more like soldiers than law enforcement officers.

About the author: Joe A. Wolverton, II, J.D. is a correspondent for The New American and travels nationwide speaking on nullification, the Second Amendment, the surveillance state, and other constitutional issues. Follow him on Twitter @TNAJoeWolverton and he can be reached at [email protected]

People Who Supported Cliven Bundy During BLM Standoff Now Being Investigated by FBI!

May 9, 2014 By Sheep Media

By Eric Odom

The nation’s most powerful Senator recently referred to those who supported rancher Cliven Bundy in his struggle against the BLM as “domestic terrorists.” Harry Reid has a nasty habit of slandering Americans and he didn’t hold back in doing so when it comes to those causing problems on land he has an interest in.

“Those people who hold themselves out to be patriots are not. They’re nothing more than domestic terrorists,” Mr. Reid in remarks at a luncheon, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, which sponsored the event. “… I repeat: What went on up there was domestic terrorism.”

When the Senate Majority leader says something like this, you know another round of government intimidation will soon follow. Which is exactly what’s now beginning to happen.

Via 8 News Now.

A dramatic development in the saga surrounding rancher Cliven Bundy, the FBI has entered the case.

The 8 News NOW I-Team has learned that FBI agents have started an investigation into the events surrounding a potentially deadly showdown one month ago.

It is one thing for Cliven Bundy and his supporters to square off against an assortment of Bureau of Land Management employees. It is quite another when the FBI enters the picture, and that is exactly what has happened.

The I-Team has confirmed that FBI agents have launched a formal investigation into alleged death threats, intimidation and possible weapons violations that culminated with a dangerous showdown on April 12, and the first people to be interviewed by FBI agents are Metro Police, starting with Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillispie.

It sounds like this is only the first round of interrogations and they’re starting with law enforcement. Next up will be those who actually attended the events described.

My question is… if people were pointing guns at law enforcement and threatening to shoot them, why is there no video evidence of it? There were plenty of cameras around on both sides of the standoff. Yet, somehow this is all going to be a he-said/she-said scenario?