The following article was originally published by The Red Green Alliance.
The motto of the New World Order and the driving force for all the madness you are seeing today: ORDER OUT OF CHAOS – “ORDO AB CHAO”
I read this time and again, in the readers comments sections of online newspapers like Breitbart UK, the Daily Express, Guardian or Daily Mail.
It’s a fatal flaw in critical thinking, and we can ill-afford it. It allows us to absolve our leaders of some of responsibility for the actions they are taking, it allows us to give them an excuse. It’s like ‘diminished responsibility’ for a psychopath killer. It is essentially APOLOGISM FOR WRONGDOING.
Why is this our natural response? part of it is that to think that the ‘refugee crisis’ is a willful and treasonous plot – is just far too awful and unbelievable. So we push such thoughts aside and offer excuses for the Elites.
But do we REALLY think they are mad, incompetent or stupid, when they have got into such lofty positions, when they have hundreds of expert advisers and think-tanks on hand, when they have virtually unlimited budgets and resources to draw upon?
I just do not believe it. If a large percentage of the general public can see the ‘insanity’ of it – of course they would too. So therefore I think this is impossible.
“How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?” – Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes: The Sign of Four (1890)
I have outlined what I think the plan has been all along. It has been arranged in a series of deliberate stages to get to the situation we are in now.
THEY are NOT mad… or incompetent… or stupid.
(1) – COLLAPSE THE DAMS OF EUROPE
My thesis is that this is all pre-planned chaos. Our leaders work for the same sick Globalists behind the scenes who wish to reshape the world into a totalitarian One World Government using the Hegelian Dialectic (“problem-reaction-solution”) [#13]. They deliberately engineered the migrant crisis [#14] by toppling all the dictators who were essentially the ‘Dams of Europe’, holding back radical Islam within their own countries, and being allowed to enrich themselves in return for stopping mass migration to Europe.
These dictators were largely secular and protected their minority groups. Mubarak of Egypt was considered a close ally of the US for 40 odd years, but when Obama came in – with his love of the Muslim Brotherhood (a group opposed and outlawed by Mubarak) – it all changed. Likewise, Assad of Syria was reforming and modernising his country – women did not have to wear veils, they could go to university, it was one of the richest and most advanced Muslim nations in the Middle East. Gaddafi of Libya, also, had transformed his nation and had in many way been ‘brought into the fold’ of Western powers. Before the crisis broke, he was meeting Blair, Sarkozy, Berlusconi and others on a regular basis and Libya was never more involved economically with Europe.
These dictators were corrupt, but in nations that are so backward it is the height of arrogance to assume that the people of those nations either wanted or understood democracy as we understood it here. Not perfect, but maybe necessary for the lawless backward populace they kept in check. But just look at all these countries today – economies ruined, lawless, masses of impoverished people hating and blaming the West – with Radical Islamists using lack of education and resentment, to recreate massive Jihad armies.
Yet the people of the West were sold the lie that this ‘Arab Spring’ was some romantic movement for democracy. Like the ‘colour revolutions’ in many ex-Soviet nations, scratch beneath the surface and you can see Western nations agitating for political gain, and billionaires like George Soros funding groups through a massive network of charities and NGOs as front groups. Even the people they employ probably do not know the agendas driving such movements.
Gaddafi himself was paid billions by the EU in bribe money to prevent a migrant crisis, negotiated by Berlusconi of Italy. This is old news – Gaddafi repeatedly warned Europe that if he was gone, Europe would be flooded with migrants. Speaking at a ceremony in Rome (2010) said that unless his request for money was met, Europe would otherwise become “another Africa” as a result of the “advance of millions of immigrants”.
“Tomorrow Europe might no longer be European and even black as there are millions who want to come in,” he said. “We don’t know if Europe will remain an advanced and united continent or if it will be destroyed, as happened with the barbarian invasions”.
No shock both leaders had to taken out (one assassinated politically, the other physically). Many suspect that the fact Gaddafi was planning a Pan-African Dinar currency [#15] might have had something to do with it, allowing nations to trade outside the petrodollar. That could not be allowed, regardless of risk to Europe. So European leaders ignored the possible and oft-stated risk of migrant invasion, to take out Gaddafi for selfish Globalist reasons (at best) or for darker ideological reasons (at worst).
Is it not highly suspicious that the “Arab Spring” happened in countries directly controlling land and sea borders into Europe? Why not in some of the other 56 Muslim- majority nations around the world?
In my view, it was a deliberate destruction of the Dams of Europe, as a precursor to a migrant invasion. Completely orchestrated ‘CHAOS BY DESIGN’.
THEY are NOT mad… or incompetent… or stupid.