• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Sheep Media

The Truth About Disinformation

  • Home
  • Government
  • Health
  • Police State
  • New World Order (NWO)
  • Economy
  • Foreign Affairs
  • War
  • Terrorism
  • Corruption
  • Chemicals
  • Conspiracy

Palestine

Ken O’Keefe On Trump, Israel, Palestine, Iran and the Prospects of World War III

January 8, 2018 By Sheep Media

TO KEEP THIS INDEPENDENT MEDIA RUNNING, PLEASE CONSIDER SUPPORTING A SHEEP NO MORE THROUGH DONATION. LINKS ARE BELOW. THANK YOU …

This video was produced by Ken O’Keefe for Press TV this documentary gets right to the point about what is happening in the Middle East.

O’Keefe has updated this production with a commentary on Donald Trump, Israel, Palestine, Iran and the prospects of World War III.

Via Ken O’Keefe:

To support A Sheep No More and keep this small, independent media reporting to you 365 days/year, please consider a donation! Thank you. – Julie Telgenhoff, Creator of A Sheep no More

Palpal: https://www.paypal.me/ASheepNoMore

Patreon https://www.patreon.com/ASheepNoMore

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/ASheepNoMore/

Twitter https://twitter.com/asheepnomore/followers

Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/+ASheepNoMore

A Sheep No More Website http://www.asheepnomore.net

Filed Under: Donald Trump, War, Zionism Tagged With: Donald Trump, Iran, Israel, Ken O'Keefe, Palestine, WWIII

Over 600 Palestinians Detained Since Trump Recognized Jerusalem Al-Quds As Israel Capital

December 27, 2017 By Sheep Media

An Israeli troop is confronted by a Palestinian protester during clashes to the north of Ramallah, on December 22, 2017. (Photo by AFP)

Over 600 Palestinians have been detained by the Tel Aviv regime forces since Washington’s move to recognize Jerusalem al-Quds as the Israeli capital. 

PressTV| According to the Palestinian Prisoners’ Society on Tuesday, 610 Palestinians, including 170 minors, 12 women and three injured people have been arrested during the three weeks since US President Donald Trump made his announcement.

The group noted that on Tuesday alone at least 24 Palestinians were arrested during pre-dawn raids across the West Bank.

It added that according to official UN figures, between December 5 and the 18, Israeli forces engaged in 162 search and arrest operations throughout the occupied Palestinian territories.

The Israeli regime has long been conducting daily incursions into Gaza and in the vicinity of the so-called buffer zone, which is located on both land and sea sides of the Gaza Strip.

On December 6, Trump announced his decision to recognize Jerusalem al-Quds as Israel’s capital and relocate the US embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem al-Quds.

On December 21, the United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly voted in favor of a resolution that calls on the US to withdraw its controversial recognition of Jerusalem al-Quds as the Israeli “capital.”

In an attempt to avert the resolution, Trump had warned that “we’re watching,” threatening reprisals against countries that back the measure, which earlier faced a US veto at the UN Security Council.

Filed Under: Zionism Tagged With: Donald Trump, Israel Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Palestine, Zionism

Just As The Globalists Planned: Anti US Demonstration Outside The US Embassy In Beirut

December 10, 2017 By Sheep Media

by Julie Telgenhoff

With The Trump Card’s recent announcement that the US embassy is moving to Jerusalem declaring that Jerusalem is now the capital of the Zionist state of Israel, all is moving forward as planned by the black magician occultists.

This may be difficult for many to believe, especially the Christian population, however, I feel that getting this information out is more important than being popular. These black magicians need to get their END TIMES SCRIPT in motion and this recent announcement will serve to do just that.

How else does one create change without CHAOS??? Do you really think that this is just some organic decision made on behalf of what and why now? Or …they knew all along this move would enrage the Muslim population???

Here I will show you a quote from 33 degree mason Albert Pike who wrote to Giuseppe Mazzini in 1871 regarding a conspiracy involving three world wars that WERE PLANNED in an attempt to take over the world.

“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion… We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”

According to the Bible and the Book of Revelations, all the nations of the world will turn against Israel during the end times.

So don’t be surprised if Israel is actually destroyed …..after all, these Satanists could care less about ANY human life …..

Via RT:

A massive rally is taking place outside the US Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon, with protesters rioting and shouting pro-Palestinian slogans in the wake of Washington’s decision on Jerusalem. Tear gas and water cannon have been deployed to control the crowd.

For ONE DOLLAR a MONTH you can support my work and give me more time to get important information out to you. My Patreon account allows for a small monthly pledge or you can support this work with a small donation via Paypal. THANK YOU for your concern. – Julie Telgenhoff, Creator of A Sheep No More

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ASheepNoMore

Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/ASheepNoMore

Filed Under: War Tagged With: Book of Revelations, End Times, Israel, Jerusalem, Palestine

The REAL Story: Trump Aide Flynn Pleads Guilty To Lying About Effort To Help Israel

December 3, 2017 By Sheep Media

Michael Flynn, center, former National Security Adviser to President Donald Trump, pleaded guilty on 1 December to lying about efforts to help Israel evade UN censure for its illegal settlements on Palestinian land. (D. Myles Cullen/Department of Defense)

Former US National Security Adviser Michael Flynn entered a guilty plea Friday to lying about efforts by the incoming Trump administration to help Israel avoid censure at the UN Security Council over its illegal settlements on occupied Palestinian land.

Yet several major US media outlets were initially silent about the Israeli connection.

Flynn appeared in federal court in Washington to admit that he lied about conversations he had with the Russian ambassador last December, in the weeks before Donald Trump took the oath of office.

The single count charges that Flynn lied to federal investigators about two conversations; in the first, on 22 December, Flynn asked the Russian envoy to delay or defeat the UN Security Council vote condemning Israel’s settlements.

In the second conversation, a week later, Flynn had asked the Russian government to refrain from retaliating harshly to sanctions imposed by the Obama administration – an act, ironically, that would benefit the United States.

According to the charge sheet, Flynn made false statements to the FBI about these conversations during questioning on 24 January 2017, days after Trump took office and Flynn was already National Security Adviser.

Flynn’s guilty plea is a result of the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller, the former FBI director appointed by the Department of Justice in May to lead a broad investigation sparked by allegations of ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Flynn’s plea is widely taken as an indication that he is cooperating with Mueller, and that he may provide evidence against other targets of the investigation.

Collusion with Israel

The Trump transition team’s effort to halt the UN resolution was unsuccessful. It passed with no opposition on 23 December, after the Obama administration declined to cast a veto.

Flynn’s plea adds to the mounting evidence of Trump’s collusion with Israel to shield it from accountability for its violations of international law.

Last month, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump’s son-in-law and Middle East peace envoy Jared Kushner was being probed by Mueller over contacts with Israeli officials aimed at thwarting the UN vote.

In October, Trump campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos also pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI in the course of the Mueller investigation.

While Papadopoulos is a far more junior figure than Flynn, he had championed Israeli settlers during an April 2016 visit to Israel. Papadopoulos’ remarks impressed one Israeli right-wing observer that “Trump has somewhat of a prism on world affairs, and that there are some reasonably informed people trying to advise him.”

Media silence

Yet despite the clear signs that Trump’s consistent concern seemed to be advancing Israeli, rather than Russian, interests, the focus in US mainstream media has barely paid attention to the collusion with Benjamin Netanyahu’s government.

Reports on the websites of NPR, CNN and CBS about Flynn’s plea seen by The Electronic Intifada on Friday morning initially made no mention of Israel at all. CBS and CNN later added information about Flynn’s role in trying to thwart the UN resolution vote.

—->CONTINUREADINGHERE<—-

Filed Under: Corruption Tagged With: Donald Trump, Israel, Michael Flynn, Palestine, Russia, United Nations

100 Years On: The Balfour Declaration Explained

November 3, 2017 By Sheep Media

This week, Palestinians around the world are marking 100 years since the Balfour Declaration was issued on November 2, 1917.

The declaration turned the Zionist aim of establishing a Jewish state in Palestine into a reality when Britain publicly pledged to establish “a national home for the Jewish people” there.

The pledge is generally viewed as one of the main catalysts of the Nakba – the ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948 – and the conflict that ensued with the Zionist state of Israel.

It is regarded as one of the most controversial and contested documents in the modern history of the Arab world and has puzzled historians for decades.

What is the Balfour Declaration?

The Balfour Declaration (“Balfour’s promise” in Arabic) was a public pledge by Britain in 1917 declaring its aim to establish “a national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine.

The statement came in the form of a letter from Britain’s then-foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, addressed to Lionel Walter Rothschild, a figurehead of the British Jewish community.

It was made during World War I (1914-1918) and was included in the terms of the British Mandate for Palestine after the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire.

The so-called mandate system, set up by the Allied powers, was a thinly veiled form of colonialism and occupation.

“Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East 

The system transferred rule from the territories that were previously controlled by the powers defeated in the war – Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria – to the victors.

The declared aim of the mandate system was to allow the winners of the war to administer the newly emerging states until they could become independent.

The case of Palestine, however, was unique. Unlike the rest of the post-war mandates, the main goal of the British Mandate there was to create the conditions for the establishment of a Jewish “national home” – where Jews constituted less than 10 percent of the population at the time.

Upon the start of the mandate, the British began to facilitate the immigration of European Jews to Palestine. Between 1922 and 1935, the Jewish population rose from nine percent to nearly 27 percent of the total population.

What the map of #Palestine looked like 100 years ago

A post shared by AJ Labs (@aj_labs) on Oct 28, 2017 at 9:50pm PDT

Though the Balfour Declaration included the caveat that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine”, the British mandate was set up in a way to equip Jews with the tools to establish self-rule, at the expense of the Palestinian Arabs.

Why was it controversial?

The document was controversial for several reasons.

Firstly, it was, in the words of the late Palestinian-American academic Edward Said, “made by a European power … about a non-European territory … in a flat disregard of both the presence and wishes of the native majority resident in that territory”.

In essence, the Balfour Declaration promised Jews a land where the natives made up more than 90 percent of the population.

Secondly, the declaration was one of three conflicting wartime promises made by the British.

When it was released, Britain had already promised the Arabs independence from the Ottoman Empire in the 1915 Hussein-McMahon correspondence.

The British also promised the French, in a separate treaty known as 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement, that the majority of Palestine would be under international administration, while the rest of the region would be split between the two colonial powers after the war.

The declaration, however, meant that Palestine would come under British occupation and that the Palestinian Arabs who lived there would not gain independence.

Finally, the declaration introduced a notion that was reportedly unprecedented in international law – that of a “national home”.

The use of the vague term “national home” for the Jewish people, as opposed to “state”, left the meaning open to interpretation.

Earlier drafts of the document used the phrase “the reconstitution of Palestine as a Jewish State”, but that was later changed.

In a meeting with Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann in 1922, however, Arthur Balfour and then-Prime Minister David Lloyd George reportedly said the Balfour Declaration “always meant an eventual Jewish state”.

The question of why the Balfour Declaration was issued has been a subject of debate for decades, with historians using different sources to suggest various explanations.

While some argue that many in the British government at the time were Zionists themselves, others say the declaration was issued out of an anti-Semitic reasoning, that giving Palestine to the Jews would be a solution to the “Jewish problem”.

In mainstream academia, however, there are a set of reasons over which there is a general consensus:

  • Control over Palestine was a strategic imperial interest to keep Egypt and the Suez Canal within Britain’s sphere of influence
  • Britain had to side with the Zionists to rally support among Jews in the United States and Russia, hoping they could encourage their governments to stay in the war until victory
  • Intense Zionist lobbying and strong connections between the Zionist community in Britain and the British government; some of the officials in the government were Zionists themselves
  • Jews were being persecuted in Europe and the British government was sympathetic to their suffering
Pages: Page 1 Page 2

Filed Under: Corruption, Foreign Affairs, Zionism Tagged With: Balfour Declaration, Britain, Israel, Ottoman Empire, Palestine, Zionisim

BYE BYE First Amendment: Democrats Join Republicans In Bill Criminalizing Speech Critical Of Israel

August 6, 2017 By Sheep Media

Will the Federal Government Make It Illegal to Protest Israel?

This article by Celisa Caracal  was originally published at AlterNet. 
A growing number of Republicans and Democrats in Congress are backing a bill that would criminalize support for the international boycott against Israel, also known as the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement.

Named the Israel Anti-Boycott Act, the bill so far has garnered support from 29 Republicans and 14 Democrats in the Senate. A similar piece of legislation introduced in the House of Representatives has 237 co-sponsors—63 Democrats and 174 Republicans. With the intent to suppress the BDS movement and others allied with the boycott against Israel, the Israel Anti-Boycott Act imposes harsh punishments: any person guilty of violating the law faces a “minimum civil penalty of $250,000 and a maximum criminal penalty of $1 million and 20 years in prison.”

The Israel Anti-Boycott Act was introduced by Democratic Sen. Benjamin Cardin on March 23 and was drafted with the help of AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. In fact, passage of the bill was listed as one of the group’s top lobbying priorities for 2017.

The bill would build upon two laws, the Export Administration Act of 1979 and the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, the former law making it illegal for U.S. corporations to cooperate with the boycott of Israel. The Office of Anti-Boycott Compliance under the Department of Commerce was created to enforce this very measure.

READ MORE: Introduction to the Israel Lobby (AIPAC) 

In addition to its already draconian felony punishments, the law would penalize people for requesting information about boycotts against Israel and would extend the boycott ban into any parts of Israel, including the settlements that were deemed to violate international law by the United Nations. The act would also expand upon the prohibition of partaking in boycotts sponsored by foreign governments to include boycotts from international organizations like the U.N. and the European Union.

On July 17, the American Civil Liberties Union published a letter it sent to all senators urging them to not support the bill on the basis that “it would punish individuals for no reason other than their political beliefs.” While the ACLU clarified that it takes no position on the international boycott of Israel, the statement asserts that, under the First Amendment, the government cannot punish people just because of their “expressed political beliefs.”

The ACLU statement further criticizes the bill for specifically singling out businesses and individuals who do not do any business with Israel for expressed political beliefs.

“There are millions of businesses and individuals who do no business with Israel, or with companies doing business there, for a number of reasons,” the statement reads.

The statement notes that the bill ignores those companies that choose not to do business with Israel purely for pragmatic reasons outside of political belief, instead punishing “businesses and individuals based solely on their point of view.”

This is not the first time lawmakers on both sides of the political spectrum have attempted to infringe on First Amendment rights with the goal of silencing supporters of the BDS movement. Many college students in recent years have faced punishment for expressing support for Palestine and the BDS movement and for pushing their college administrations to cut ties with corporations that conduct business with Israel.

In 2015, members of the Board of Regents who oversee the University of California system—along with support from University president Janet Napolitano—attempted to pass speech codes that would severely crack down on forms of Israel criticism and anti-Israeli activism. Students at any UC campus violating the speech codes would be faced with suspension or even expulsion.

This March, the New York State Senate passed two bills that would strip funding from students and college organizations that participate in “hate speech related to Israel” or partake in boycotts of “Israel and American allied nations.” A third bill passed that same week would prohibit the state from contracting with or investing in businesses that support the BDS movement.

Ironically enough, a number of the bill’s supporters include Democratic lawmakers who have positioned themselves as leaders of the anti-Trump resistance. California Sen. Ted Lieu, who is one of the bill’s co-sponsors, has previously championed the protection of civil liberties and announced he would send monthly donations to the ACLU to resist Trump. New York Sens. Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand, the latter of whom has been floated as a potential 2020 contender to Trump, have also co-sponsored the bill despite their purported support of civil liberties.

It also seems that a number of Senate Democrats have blindly backed a bill they have little knowledge of, according to inquiries sent to co-sponsors of the bill by the Intercept.

When told of the ACLU’s letter, Democratic Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan said, “What’s the Act? You’ll have to get back to me on that.” Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez from New Jersey, considered a reliable congressional ally to AIPAC, told the Intercept, “I’d want to read it….I’d have to look at it.”

With politicians providing lip service to protecting civil liberties and First Amendment rights, it is baffling and alarming that so many of these “free speech advocates” would throw support behind a bill that is not shy about its intent to punish people for their political beliefs.

 About the author: Celisa Calacal is a junior writing fellow for AlterNet. She is a senior journalism major and legal studies minor at Ithaca College in Ithaca, New York. Previously she worked at ThinkProgress and served as an editor for Ithaca College’s student newspaper. Follow her at @celisa_mia.

Filed Under: Corruption, Zionism Tagged With: AIPAC, BDS Movement, Boycott Israel, First Amendment, Free Speech, Israel, Israel Anti-Boycott Act, Palestine, Zionism

You Can Now Pretend To Kill Palestinians At Israeli Tourist Camps For Only $115

July 21, 2017 By Sheep Media

These part-propaganda, part-morbid fantasy “terror camps” provide tourists a chance to play the role of IDF soldiers in dramatic situations.

#military #guns #tactical #sof #specialforces #swat #police #tacticaltraining #nra #usarmy #idf #israel #kravmaga #caliber3 #marines #sniper pic.twitter.com/bVRY4Z4wrG

— CloseQuartersCombat (@CloseCombatNET) July 6, 2017

Holidays are all about having fun, exploring new places and relaxing in the sun. However, the latest tourist attraction in Israel seems to be the complete opposite of that.

Apparently, half a dozen of fantasy terror camps have popped up throughout Israel and the West Bank, offering tourists from across the globe a chance to pretend-kill terrorists, who look suspiciously like Palestinian Arabs, only for $115 per person.

These facilities allow visitors to train like IDF soldiers and act in a variety of stimulated situations — including an explosion at a Jerusalem marketplace, a stabbing attack, a sniper tournament and a live demonstration with attack dogs.

The two-hour “training camp,” which is frankly part-propaganda and part-morbid amusement, provides travelers “a taste of the Israeli military experience,” according to Haaretz.

Caliber 3 in the Israeli settlement bloc of Gush Etzion in the West Bank is reportedly the most popular of all these “anti-terror” camps. IDF Colonel Sharon Gat established the facility, which later inspired several others across the country, back in 2003. He said approximately 15,000 to 25,000 tourists visit Caliber 3 each year and the majority of the visitors are American Jews.

However, in recent years, these military stimulation sites, which do nothing but promote the anti-Palestinian sentiment, have also gained massive popularity among travelers from Brazil, Argentina, France, Italy, Russia and China — even those who are on work-related trips and religious pilgrimages.

It is also important to note the tourists use actual guns and have former soldiers and retired officials to guide them.

–>Read More Here<–

Filed Under: Corruption Tagged With: Israel, Israeli Defense Force (IDF), Palestine, Terror Camps

The Rothschilds Own Israel – and Direct its Genocidal Policy

March 1, 2017 By Sheep Media

This article by Makia Freeman was originally published at The Freedom Articles.

The Rothschilds own 80% of Israel, according to Simon Schama.

They built the Israeli Supreme Court.

They own Reuters and the Associated Press (AP), the two biggest media agencies in the world.

They have a controlling share in the Royal Dutch oil company, the Bank of England and the LBMA (London Bullion Market Association).

They foment wars, install presidents, dethrone kings and bankrupt nations, such is their power.

The Rothschilds typically operate behind the scenes.

In the case of Israel, the Rothschilds engineered WWI and waited until 1917 when Britain was in trouble. The Rothschilds then promised the British Government that they could get the US to enter WWI (on the side of Britain) and thus ensure Britain’s victory over Germany et al. However, they wanted something in return: Palestine. Thus the Balfour Declaration was created, which is an official letter from the British Government Foreign Secretary James Balfour to Baron Rothschild. It states that: “His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object.”

There is a big problem with this.

Palestine was never Britain’s to give away.

It rightfully belongs to the Arab and Palestinian people living there.

The Rothschild Zionist Jews came in, took over and forcibly evacuated and killed millions of Palestinians who lived there.

They are still committing genocide to this day.

The Rothschilds’ Family Logo. The Rothschilds got the British Government in 1917 to promise them Palestine (in exchange for getting the US into WWI). They own 80% of Israel.

The creation of the Zionist state Israel was massively unjust right from the start. Something conceived in iniquity breeds conflict down the road.

ALSO READ: The Complete History Of The ‘House Of Rothschild’

It is no exaggeration to say that the founding of Israel itself may be the precursor to WWIII.

Zionist Israel controls the governments of the US, Britain, Canada, France and more – and the Rothschilds control Israel.

About the author:  Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative news / independent media site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com (FaceBook here), writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance.

Filed Under: Corruption, Zionism Tagged With: A Sheep No More, Associated Press (AP), Britain, Genocide, Israel, Palestine, Reuters, Rothschilds, The Balfour Declaration, WWI, Zionism

California Lawmakers OK Bill Penalizing Companies Boycotting Israel

September 2, 2016 By Sheep Media

“AB 2844 is both an attack on the constitutional rights of Californians and a waste of taxpayer money,” read a statement from the Coalition to Stop AB 2844.

Companies boycotting Israel would lose California government contracts, under bill passed by California lawmakers.
Companies boycotting Israel would lose California government contracts, under bill passed by California lawmakers.

teleSUR| Both houses of California’s legislature have now approved a bill to ban state government agencies from awarding contracts to companies that choose to join the international boycott against Israel’s continued occupation of Palestine.

The bill, AB 2844, if passed, would be a serious attack on the worldwide Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement against Israeli apartheid and its treatment of Palestinians.

Companies who choose to boycott Israel, would be accused of being in violation of the state’s civil rights law and would not be permitted to accept a California government contract of $US100,000 or more.

The bill, which has eight different amendments, was eventually passed 60 to 0 in the assembly, and will now go to Governor Jerry Brown for has to decide whether to veto or sign the bill into law by the end of September.

BDS and civil rights advocates have urged Brown to veto the bill, while supporters of the bill have made much of the trade ties between the U.S. and Israel, as well as Israel’s positive treatment of LGBTQ persons as a reason for supporting AB 2844 – ignoring Israel’s long history of oppressing and collectively punishing Palestinians.

“AB 2844 is both an attack on the constitutional rights of Californians and a waste of taxpayer money, estimated to cost upwards of $140 million annually, according to the California Department of Finance, which opposes it,” read a statement from the Coalition to Stop AB 2844, which includes over 100 civil society organizations.

“Government should not be in the business of punishing supporters of BDS, whether corporations, universities, organizations or individuals, by denying them contracts,” said Nasser Barghouti from the U.S. Campaign to End The Israeli Occupation.

criticize-21

A number of other states, including New York and New Jersey, have passed similar laws to outlaw the boycott of Israel.

Be Sociable, Share!

Filed Under: Corruption, Economy, Government, Mind Control, New World Order (NWO), Politics, Zionism Tagged With: A Sheep No More, AB 2844, Boycott, CA Governor Jerry Brown, California, Civil Rights, Israel, Palestine, United States, Zionism

The Banking ‘Transfer Agreement’ Between Hitler and the Zionists

July 28, 2015 By Sheep Media

timthumb.php_3

Follow the money…

21STCENTURYWIRE| In a recent interview for Book TV, investigative journalist Edwin Black talks about his extraordinary book, “The Transfer Agreement” and its 25th Anniversary republication.

Best-selling author Black, who himself is Jewish, outlines an apparently coordinated effort between the Nazis, American and European Jewish Zionists and the British, in a financial operation where millions in profit was generated between two banks set up to handle the transfer of Jewish assets out of Germany – Pal Troy (or Pal Treu) Bank in Germany, and the Anglo-Palestine Bank located in British Palestine. Question: who owned these two banks?

(Video) Rabbi Weiss Explains Zionism vs Judaism and Zionists Have Hijacked the Jewish Religion  

With the help of Adolph Hitler and the Third Reich, some 60,000 German Jews emigrated to British Palestine (now Israel) between 1933 and 1941 through the “Transfer Agreement” between Nazis and Zionists, where Jewish property with an estimated valued at $100 million – was transferred out in the form of German industrial goods used to build Israel’s early European-style infrastructure.
In the beginning, it was all about money, but when the deals soured and America entered the war, the Transfer Agreement came to a halt, and other monies began pouring into Nazi Germany from the bankers in New York.

This is an uncomfortable, yet key piece of complex financial history that many modern scribes are quite unwilling to explore…

Filed Under: Banks, Federal Reserve, New World Order (NWO), Politics, Zionism Tagged With: Central Bankers, Edwin Black, Hitler, Israel, NAZI Germany, Palestine, The Transfer Agreement, Zionism

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS
  • Twitter

About A Sheep No More

A Sheep No More is no longer plugged into the Matrix like the many sheep who are still programmed to believe that they have correct information provided by a varied and “independent media.” In fact the media is owned by 5 or 6 mega-media companies run by corporate advertising executives and Washington.

Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Never miss a word from us. Get email updates!

Archives

Copyright © 2017 Sheep Media. All Rights Reserved.