Commonwealth leaders made the decision Friday during a meeting at Windsor Castle, according to several local media reports.
Commonwealth leaders made the decision Friday during a meeting at Windsor Castle, according to several local media reports.
Princess Diana may have had a secret daughter named Sarah, who was kept hidden from the public due to pressure from the Royal family.
In 2014 Sarah confronted Prince Charles during a secret meeting in England where she accused him of killing her mother.
The entire confrontation was apparently caught on tape by Globe Magazine, who recorded the confrontation between Sarah and Charles on a surveillance camera.
Globe magazine claims that after Charles and Diana married the fertilised eggs were supposed to be destroyed but a rogue doctor implanted one of the embryos into his wife.
The mag alleges that a 33-year old New England woman, who they say is called Sarah, was born before William and Harry.
Globe says she is now living incognito in New England in the United States, and has feared for her life following Diana’s death in a Paris car crash in 1997.
It’s quite a tale, and one bolstered by the fact that Diana did undergo a gynaecological examination before her engagement to Charles, according to a report in the Daily Mail.
But Dan Brown couldn’t write it any better, and in fact the whole story bears a quite spooky resemblance to a fictional book entitled The Disappearance Of Olivia about a supposed secret daughter of Diana’s.
The author, Nancy E. Ryan, imagined a story in which an oncologist who “admired Princess Diana and wanted to emulate her” discovers she is Diana’s secret daughter. In the novel, Olivia also lives in hiding, much like ‘Sarah.’
Asked once whether there was any basis in fact of her story, Ryan replied, “It’s not for me to say. I believe that my story could have been true. Many have told me that they believe my story is the only one that is entirely plausible. These same people also think that Prince Charles wanted Diana to be fertile that he might have pushed Diana into having her eggs harvested to prove her fertility… I believe that fantasies allow us to explore our feelings. I hope that Diana’s fans would understand that the book allows us to say ‘What if?’”
Deprogram Yourself| Russian President Vladimir Putin has actually issued a call-to-action to individuals of Britain, saying that following the murder of their precious Princess Diana 18 years earlier, the country needs to prosecute the Royal household after definitive evidence has emerged that they was accountable for her assassination.
Throughout a solemn Christmas luncheon at the Kremlin, Putin accused Queen Elizabeth, the late Queen Mother, Prince Philip, and Prince Charles of arranging the murder of Princess Diana via MI6 representatives in Paris. He states that after talking to Elton John on the telephone last month, he was privy to undeniable evidence that the royal household had blood on their hands.
During a casual and reflective speech, Putin informed a select group of associates and esteemed state-approved journalists that Diana’s brutal assassination brought him unfathomably to tears at the time in 1997, and that he understood deep down that her death was because of foul-play.
Putin, who pledges to ruin the Illuminati in 2016, stated that the late terrific Princess Diana was a thorn in the side of the corrupt British facility, and worked as a continuous danger to their presence due to the fact she understood way too much about exactly what the Illuminati had in store for mankind.
Holding back the tears, Putin stood at the table with a glass of Vodka raised, and proclaimed:
“She was about to go on the world’s stage and tell a very shocking truth”, he told the crowd who had just finished their blini appetiser.
“And now, friends, I know this truth and I am prepared to let the world know too,” he warned, before slamming the drink back.
He continued, “That person sitting in Buckingham palace isn’t some innocent wrinkly old monkey. She’s evil incarnate. The whole rotten family needs to abolished”.
According to among the reporters present, the crowd erupted into spontaneous applause at the male they have actually affectionally dubbed ‘The Illuminati Killer’ in Moscow.
Thanks for taking the time to read this article. If you found this information helpful, please share it with your friends and family. Your support in our endeavor of sharing free information would be much appreciated.
Seemingly, the number of officials and prominent citizens that would abuse our children seems to have no limit and nobody is doing anything about it.
In the light of my revelations regarding the concerted effort of both Virginia’s CPS and Illinois CPS to abduct and sex traffic Monika Wesolowski’s son, Dylan, it should not surprise anyone that prominent leaders of the global elite are at the forefront of this scourge upon humanity.
In Part two of this series, I detailed how former Centre District Attorney, Ray Gricar, was “disappeared” after getting too close to the child pimping activities of Jerry Sandusky’s Second Mile Foundation, which was sponsored by many influential corporate and political figures.
When this scandal reached into the office of the Governor of Pennsylvania, the media reports abruptly ceased. I must admit that I am still appalled about how high this international conspiracy goes in terms of abducting our children and ultimately sex trafficking them to the elite for their perverted pleasures.
Brandon Turbeville successfully linked proven British pedophile Jimmy Savile to Prince Charles. Conveniently, and follow Savile’s death, his heinous exploits against children were revealed. Among the tales include how he used to tour children’s hospitals and select children for his underground child sex ring.
He and the Prince were exceptionally close. In fact, he served as a marriage counselor, of sorts, to Prince Charles. The connections between the two, as pointed out in the Turbeville article, are undeniable. After looking at the evidence, summarized by Turbeville, it is hard to not conclude that Prince Charles did indeed traffic in stolen children.
Another royal family member, the Queen, is no stranger to child sex trafficking.
More recently, from this past March, the UK High Court Justice Fulford, a long time advisor to Queen Elizabeth, was named as a co-defendant along with Pope Francis, in international court proceedings looking into their involvement in cleric child abuse, trafficking rings and evidence cover ups.
Judge Fulford threw out 22,000 pieces of evidence in a 2011 Hague ICC International court that implicated the former Pope Joseph Ratzinger to child rapists. This same Brussels international court issued arrest warrants on Queen Elizabeth and former Pope Joseph Ratzinger after finding them guilty, along with 38 other global elites, in the rape, torture and murder of over 50,000 missing Canadian indigent children.
Did you know that Queen Elizabeth was actually convicted on February 28, 2013 in the disappearance of ten native children from the British Columbia Catholic Kamloops residential school on October 10, 1964? Pope Ratzinger resigned from office that same day on February 28, 2013. So, how does the Queen retain her title and stay out of prison?
Pope Francis’, Pope Benedict’s and Queen Elizabeth’s use of a Vatican agreement called “Crimen Sollicitationas” prevented release of information to legal authorities for prosecution of crimes against an estimated millions of priest child abuse victims.
A Vatican source claimed to ITCCS’ Kevin Annett that Queen Elizabeth signed the document with Pope Benedict on September 16, 2010 at Holyrood Castle in Edinburgh. Evidence pertaining to the Feb. 2013 international court could be found in Annett’s “Hidden No Longer” and at Child Abuse Recovery.
George Soros and his currency manipulation causes the downfall of nations. Every President fears Soros; long reach. Soros’ long reach is not confined to his pedophile bedroom. Soros is involved in NAMBA.
The North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) begins to figure prominently into this picture. In the past, one of their trademark phrases was “sex before eight, or it’s too late”. This is an obvious attempt to remove the last perverted prohibition from our legal code as well as our societal safeguards to protect our children.
Words cannot describe how sick and perverted these people truly are. And before you think that this could never become a reality, please consider that globalist, George Soros, gives money to NAMBLA. If that is not concerning enough for you please realize that Kevin Jennings, an Obama Department of Education official, has involvement with this group as well. George Soros and Kevjn Jennings is Savile’s equivalent counterpart. However, we do not have to implicate the elite through their controllers such as Soros, because according most researchers, we have direct involvement with the White House.
Paul M. Rodriguez and George Archibald reported, on June 29 1989, the Washington Times’ reported that a Washington D.C. prostitution ring that had intimate connections with the White House all the way up to President George H.W. Bush.
Male prostitutes had been given access to the White House and the article also cited evidence in which minors were abducted for use in child sex trafficking and were pimped out to the elite. The claims were dismissed by authorities as “fantasy”, however, former Nebraska State Senator John DeCamp later investigated the claims and was horrified to learn that they were indeed legitimate and George H. W. Bush was implicated in DeCamp’s investigation.
In July 1990, a Nebraska Grand Jury was convened to hear allegations that Lawrence King Jr., then manager of the Franklin Community Federal Credit Union and a rising Republican Party star, along with prominent Washington lobbyists, had set up a child prostitution ring in which minors were transported around the country and forced to have sex with King, other top officials, and according to victims who some allege they were later harassed into recanting the direct involvement of then-Vice-President Bush.
On two occasions, I interviewed Nick Bryant, author of the book entitled The Franklin Scandal, in which he implicated Lawrence King Jr. in child sex trafficking. Bryant, too, implicated George H. W. Bush as being part of the network of the elite using child sex slaves. Amazingly, King was invited to sing the national anthem at the 1984 Republican convention in Dallas. The elder Bush repeatedly promoted King, throughout the ’80s was described as a GOP high-roller.
The DC Madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey threatening to expose her client, after being arrested. Palfrey was found dead after being “suicided”, despite the fact that Palfrey had complained of a contract being put out on her life. Her “list” allegedly implicated George H. W. Bush.
During the investigation, Ronald Reagan was implicated as well. These few accounts represents a much bigger set of allegations from over a dozen researchers which implicate the former President in his role related to child sex trafficking.
Isn’t it interesting the Bill Clinton was tagged to run against, and later defeat, Pappy Bush. Is anyone else able to connect the dots?
Three weeks ago, Michael Egan III, a former Hollywood actor, accused Bryan Singer, the producer of X-Men, of repeatedly raping Egan when he was a child/. Egan alleges that the abuse took place at parties in which he states that several young boys were sexually abused and held against their will. Charges, such as these by child actors are commonplace, but because they are actors, few take their allegations seriously.
To survive in the world of sex trafficking, most embrace drugs and alcohol as a way to numb the pain of being used as a sex object with no value. Trafficked children are brainwashed into believing that they are worthless and unworthy of love and that the gifts and twisted form of affection they receive are more than they deserve.
Less then one percent of sex trafficked children escape and the average lifetime of a trafficked child is seven years. This gives Hollywood producers plausible deniability because their accusers are on drugs which makes the authorities question the authenticity of the chargers.
Something that will never be discussed on Entertainment Tonight is where does the money come from to fund snuff films in which child actors are sexually abused and then murdered on camera.
Great Britain is a key link in the biggest ever international investigation into the production and supply of pedophile snuff films in which children are murdered on film after being sexually abused. The investigation includes many snuff films obtained from many countries across Europe with the origins coming out Russian and Israel.
The most shockng category of sex and snuff films made was code-named ‘Necros Pedo’ in which children were raped and tortured until they died. Allegations that Hollywood is underwriting the whole process continue to swirl. However, the authorities are not looking, they do not care. Nothing will ever be done until we force the authorities to do something.
“Bruce Edwin of Starpower Management provides advice to anyone intending to become part of the entertainment industry. He says “Never leave your child under 18, unattended or out of your sight in the entertainment industry. Always be with them and have them in your sight. This is true for kids in an interview with an agent, on an audition, or on a job at a major studio or similar.”
A friendly reminder that State Department employee, and victim of the Virginia and the Illinois CPS’, will be appearing on my show on May 25 from 930pm-midnight (Central time) in which she will provide the details of how she was politically targeted and her child was stolen without any sustainable charge of wrongdoing.Wesolowski has the proof to validate her claims that her five year old boy is being sex trafficked.
To those naive people who could never believe that the leaders of the world could be complicit in participating in the elite controlled sex rings on the planet, I would say that this article does not even come close to doing justice to the depth of this satanically inspired practice. If mankind cannot protect the most innocent part of its humanity, then we are indeed a despicable species
Fresh on the heels of the fallout from revelations regarding former BBC entertainer Jimmy Savile and his unbelievably sickening and innumerable instances of child molestation as well as the “look the other way” approach taken by the BBC, more and more questions are now emerging in regards to the connection between Savile and British Royalty, most notably Prince Charles.
At least, more questions should be emerging.
Unfortunately, however, the British mainstream media is deeming Prince Charles and the rest of his ilk in positions of power and perceived genetic royalty as if they are beyond reproach. This approach is typical and to be expected, yet it is also highly ironic considering the fact that such is the same position the mainstream media took with the allegations against Jimmy Savile for so many years.
As a result of the Savile affair, mainstream outlets, particularly the BBC, now have a lot of egg on their faces in the areas of credibility and respect.In short, any connections placing Prince Charles in an uncompromising position regarding his connections with Savile or his potential for sharing a penchant for unnatural relationships with children is being completely ignored if not officially covered up.
Although Prince Charles’ friendship with Jimmy Savile, allegedly begun when the two met in the 1970s during the course of working with children’s wheelchair sports charities, is now well-known, the extent to which the Prince and the Pedophile were connected appears to go much deeper than the mainstream media reports let on.
Of course, the two having come in contact at a “charity” event for the disabled is not too far-fetched, even if it is being reported by corporate outlets. After all, using children’s “charities” as a hunting ground and a cover for his true motives was a notorious method used by Savile who actually lived in children’s homes and hospitalsso as to be closer to his victims. This method is by no means specific to Savile, however, as many other sexual predators and pedophiles know exactly what areas of society to be involved in and what careers to pursue in order to gain access to their victims. Jerry Sandusky stands as a perfect example.
Clarence House, Prince Charles’ spokesman, declined comment on much of the relationship between Savile and Charles, only claiming that the relationship was mostly a result of their “shared interest in supporting disability charities.”
Supporting charities, indeed.
Of course, Savile was doing much more than “supporting disability charities.” That is, unless one places serial child rape in a much different category than the average person might. Indeed, one would not be judged out of place to question whether or not untold numbers of sexually assaulted children thoroughly cancels out any financial “support” that may have been given in the past. Apparently, in the view of British royalty, it does not.
In fact, child molester Savile has enjoyed an unbelievable level of access to the Royal Family for the past 40 years.
For instance, in the late 1980s, Savile was said to have acted as a type of marriage counselor between Charles and Diana, visiting their residence several times. At these visits, Dickie Arbiter, who took care of media relations for the Prince and Princess between 1988 and 2000 stated that, at these visits, Savile’s behavior was uncouth to say the very least.
He would walk into the office and do the rounds of the young ladies taking their hands and rubbing his lips all the way up their arms if they were wearing short sleeves. If it was summer [and their arms were bare] his bottom lip would curl out and he would run it up their arms. This was at St James’s Palace. The women were in their mid to late 20s doing typing and secretarial work.
Not only that, but Savile was brought in to the private marital affairs of the Royals once again in order to help the Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson, in matters which were not disclosed to the public. Savile later claimed he was brought in to help “Fergie” keep her profile down.
Obviously, the relationship forged between Charles and Savile went far beyond two men who merely performed charity work for the same organizations. This can be evidenced by the fact that, in 1990, Charles even consulted Savile for advice on the appointment of a senior aide for himself and Princess Diana.
The relationship between Charles and Savile, particularly Savile’s access to the Royal Family’s affairs and the respect which was afforded Savile in this regard, has confused many onlookers. After all, Savile was nothing more than a BBC presenter and disc jockey who was well past his prime. Not to mention the fact that Savile was well known as an uncontrollable freak, although many were under the impression that Savile’s television persona was merely part of his schtick.
Yet the clues to the Prince’s friendship with the Pedophile might have more to do with similar interests in entertainment than a mere happenstance relationship. Although the evidence which connects Prince Charles to pedophilia is nowhere near as documented as that of Jimmy Savile, a trail of information certainly seems to be leading in that direction.
At this point, it should be mentioned that, although the official line is that Savile and Charles met in the 1970s as part of the coincidence of mutual charity work, Savile himself has stated that he was friends with the Royal family “for a million years.” In fact, it was reported that Savile actually stated he was introduced to the Royals in 1966 by Lord Mountbatten, a known pedophile and sexual pervert. In addition to Mountbatten, however, Greg Hallett, in his book Hitler Was A British Agent, also names Prince Philip as a pedophile. In reference to how he became introduced and ingratiated with the Royal family, Savile stated,
Coming from Lord Louis, who was the favourite uncle of Prince Philip, that was quite something. So obviously I hooked up with the Prince – what was good enough for Lord Louis was good enough for him.
So, already, we have Savile, a notorious pedophile linked to other individuals of the Royal Family named as pedophiles as well. Prince Philip, of course, is Prince Charles’ father. Lord Mountbatten is largely considered Charles’ mentor.
Savile was indeed close to British Royals as well as other elites for many years. It seems his qualification for such high connections were mainly due to his ability to obtain children for the twisted appetites of those considered beyond reproach for the mainstream media and, unfortunately, the general public.
Savile himself seemed to hint at this possibility in an interview conducted with Esquire where he stated, “The thing about me is I get things done and I work deep cover.”
Savile’s ridiculous television show (created for the sole purpose of enhancing his access to children) was thus appropriately named, Jimmy’ll Fix It. Unfortunately, the vast majority of the public were completely unaware as to what he was fixing and who he was fixing it for.
Essentially, it is clear that Jimmy Savile was a procurer of children not only for himself but also for wealthy pedophiles all across the world, particularly in Britain. Even Savile’s own nephew has recently gone public with information tying Savile to a network of pedophiles and sick sexual parties where children were repeatedly raped. Guy Marsden, Savile’s nephew, also stated that the parties were attended by household names in show business.
However, as is being widely reported in the news, Savile’s escapades of pedophilia were by no means limited to parties with the elite of entertainment. Many of his attacks on children took place in the halls of the hospitals and charities he helped fund and operate, even residing in his own personal room at two of these institutions. At this point, it is worth noting that Savile and Prince Charles are open “supporters” of the same charities.
Apparently, Prince Charles and the Pedophile did have some similar tastes, some of which were even reported by the mainstream media. In 1999, after the Prince accepted Savile’s invitation to a private meal at Savile’s home in Glencoe, Scotland, Savile had arranged for three women to parade around dressed in pinafores, a type of dress without sleeves and an open back that is often worn over other dresses. Interestingly enough, pinafores were often worn by children.
After the dinner, Charles wrote Savile a Christmas Card with a note that read, “Jimmy, with affectionate greetings from Charles. Give my love to your ladies in Scotland.”
Of course, the mainstream is certain that Charles is referring to the local women brought in for the Royal entertainment. However, unless the hired help made an exceptional impression upon the mind of Charles, one must wonder whether or not these particular ladies are the “ladies” to which Charles is referring in his Christmas note. After all, Savile’s Scottish cottage was also the scene of much child abuse as well.
Later, Charles sent Savile a box of cigars and a pair of gold cufflinks on his 80th birthday along with another note that cryptically read, “Nobody will ever know what you have done for this country Jimmy. This is to go some way in thanking you for that.” Fortunately, many are now aware of what Jimmy has done for his country. Clearly, it would be best if they are given the full story along with it.
This is not likely to happen, however, as global pedophile rings are generally made up of some of the most elite individuals the world over. This is particularly relevant when it comes to any questions regarding the behavior of the Royal Prince. At any moment when there is a chance that information might be leaked that would be damaging to the reputation of genetic royalty, the documents are sealed, the whistleblowers are dealt with, and the controversy covered up.
Some have even speculated that Princess Diana sealed her own fate after threatening to reveal networks of pedophilia within the Royal family. Indeed, Diana did speak of “dark forces” and members of an “organization” that were monitoring her shortly before her death.
For instance, when it appeared that the so-called Black Spider Memos, a series of letters written by Charles to government ministers, would damage the perception of Charles’ impartiality if he were to become king, then memos were immediately blocked by the British government. Indeed, it would be extremely interesting to see the contents of the letters, since, in reality, the impartiality of the king is truly irrelevant in the grand scheme of British society and government.
What is particularly interesting is that the letters are being blocked from release now, as the biggest pedophilia scandal in British history is unfolding – specifically, at a time when one of the main focal points of the scandal, Jimmy Savile, was a close friend of the Prince. Even more so, it comes at a time when British government officials are also being implicated in pedophilia networks.
For those who may still be under the impression that pedophilia is a crime beyond the capabilities of British politicians, take a look at this partial compilation of British politicians convicted of pedophilia in recent years.
But, while the connections between Prince Charles and the Pedophile Jimmy Savile are themselves enough to make one wonder, the fact is that Savile is not the only relationship with a potential pedophile that Charles has maintained.
As reported by the Digital Journal, the Right Reverend Peter Ball, who is thought to be “the most senior member of the Church of England,” was recently been arrested in connection to a child sexual abuse case. Ball was arrested on eight suspected cases of abuse against boys and young men ranging from ages 12 to 20 during the 1980s to 1990s. Ball, who was the former Bishop of Gloucester, resigned in 1993 after he was served with a police caution for “committing an act of gross indecency against a teenager.”
Upon his resignation, Ball retired to Manor Lodge, “a wisteria-clad property owned by the Duchy of Cornwall.” Manor Lodge is the private estate of Prince Charles.
In reference to his new living arrangements, Ball stated, “He (Prince Charles) has been wonderfully kind and allowed me to have a duchy house. The prince is a loyal friend. I have immense admiration for him, he has been through horrific times and is a great person.”
Considering the connections and personal friendships maintained by Prince Charles, one must question whether or not Charles himself has had some experience in the underworld of pedophilia. At the very least, the Prince is the absolute worst judge of character who ever lived.
What is also very interesting regarding the people named in these child sex scandals and the scope of the scandals themselves, is that the individuals who have been trying their best to bring this information to light have been ignored and derided for years on end. This has been the case whether the individuals were whistleblowers, researchers, or even victims themselves.
For instance, while much of mainstream Britain has had quite a time laughing at David Icke, suddenly his claims do not seem so fantastic and funny after all. Indeed, it was Icke who mentioned the global cabal of pedophiles and even many of the participants in them by name many years ago. While his voice was scarcely heard above the laughter at the time, he is, at the very least, on the record as having exposed these networks early on.
As for Icke’s remarks regarding the scandal today, he had this to say on November 7, 2012.
This guy, William Hague, the foreign Secretary, needs to be questioned on why that Welsh inquiry into the massive pedophilia in Welsh children’s homes was given the brief that it did and therefore stopped these kids from talking about what happened to them. And this is the big thing. If the police investigation does not knock on the door of Buckingham Palace over this whole Savile [case] and the wider implications that have followed then it’s a cover up. Because the British Royal family are fundamentally involved in this right to the top. Right up to the people like Prince Philip and all these other people . . . . . This man [Savile] was an aging sleazy disc jockey, right? And he had complete access to the British Royal family AND they used him as an official go-between [with] Prince Charles and Princess Diana when they were falling out in their marriage. And now it’s come out this week that he was advising Prince Charles on aids to employ. Why is this man so close or was so close to the British Royal Family? The answer to that will bring the British Royal family down.
Considering Icke’s accuracy in terms of information on this particular issue, perhaps it would be wise if those who heard him speak years ago might take him a little more serious the second time around.