• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Sheep Media

The Truth About Disinformation

  • Home
  • Government
  • Health
  • Police State
  • New World Order (NWO)
  • Economy
  • Foreign Affairs
  • War
  • Terrorism
  • Corruption
  • Chemicals
  • Conspiracy

Saudi Arabi

US Weapons Makers Stocks Soar To Record Highs After Massive Saudi Arabia Arms Deal

May 24, 2017 By Sheep Media

This article by Jason Ditz was originally published by antiwar.com.

Lockheed Martin, Raytheon Seen as the Biggest ‘Winners’

The weekend finalization of a US arms deal with Saudi Arabia which officials say will be worth at least $350 billion over the next decade sent the stocks of politically well-connected US arms makers soaring to all-time highers, underscoring just how much money there is to be had in keeping Saudi Arabia awash in weapons to drop on Yemen.

Lockheed Martin is the biggest “winner,” most analysts agree, with some $28 billion in weapons and equipment out of the initial $110 billion going to them, and likely to get the biggest sum out of anyone else in the subsequent parts and maintenance that will bring it to a record $350 billion overall.

Others say Raytheon may be a “dark horse” for investors, with the company’s wildly expensive Patriot missile systems likely to be a substantial chunk of the Saudi purchase. Still, it’s hard to see them matching Lockheed’s sale of planes to drop more bombs on Yemen.

Still, when picking winners the situation is very much relative, as when the arms makers all belly up to the bar to get a chunk of this deal, you can bet the Trump Administration will ensure all the big ones get a taste. That’s why virtually all the big arms makers, and not just Lockheed and Raytheon, are touching record highs. Everybody’s got something coming here, and with $350 billion to go around, it can’t help but be big for them.

President Trump is eager to present the deal as good for jobs, good to the economy, and Wall Street is eager to project winners.

You don’t need a crystal ball to predict the losers, of course.

Top of the list is Yemen, and following closely behind is whomever else the Saudis decide to attack with all these costly weapons in the years that follow.

Filed Under: War Tagged With: Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Saudi Arabi

Who Supports The Islamic State (ISIS)? Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, Israel, UK, France, USA

December 1, 2015 By Sheep Media

The following Infographics is by Professor Tim Anderson

It summarizes detailed information regarding the ISIS, which is contained in a forthcoming book entitle The Dirty War on Syria.

syria-isis-backers-1

Filed Under: Terrorism, War Tagged With: A Sheep No More, France, ISIS, Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabi, Syria, Terrorism, Turkey, UK, US

CIA Contractor: “ISIS Fabricated Enemy” Funded by U.S. & it’s Allies

September 1, 2014 By Sheep Media

img_5540

Former CIA contractor, Steven Kelley states unequivocally that ISIS is a:

“completely fabricated enemy.” Kelly continues on to say “The funding is completely from the United States and its allies and for people to think that this enemy is something that needs to be attacked in Syria or Iraq is a farce because obviously this is something that we create it, we control and only now it has become inconvenient for us to attack this group as a legitimate enemy.”

The CIA/Mossad/MI6 (all intelligence agencies) are the terrorists as is the banking cartel who use the US government, it’s military and other countries, like Saudi, Turkey, Qatar, UK, France, Israel to harbor and/or fund these radicals.

The Muslims are NOT the real enemy as we see that crazies from all walks of life are joining these radical groups for the money and fake power this gives them also knowing that they are protected by all the intelligence agencies listed above. Please also remember that a man in a cave did not plan the 9/11/01 false flag attacks on US soil, once again the involvement of intelligence agencies.

The banking cartel needs a bigger enemy than al Qaeda because their plans for total domination of the Middle East has been deterred due to good people fighting back with truth, hence we have the “bigger and badder” ISIS and/or ISIL creation.

Why Does ISIS Fit In So Perfectly With The PNAC Plan?

This is sometimes difficult to explain because there are radicals murdering people in the Middle East, however, if the funding and intelligence were taken away, those countries under attack, like Syria, could DEFEAT the enemy (ISIS/ISIL) by the use of their own military.

Please LISTEN to this short, 3 minute video. Thank you:

Filed Under: Banks, Corruption, False Flag Operations, Federal Reserve, Foreign Affairs, Propaganda, Terrorism, Vatican, War, Zionism Tagged With: A Sheep No More, Banking Cartel, CIA, France, Iraq, ISIS, Israel, MI6, Mossad, Qatar, Saudi Arabi, Syria, Terrorists, Turkey, UK, war

Syria, Bahrain: A Tale of Two Uprisings …One Fabricated, the Other Forgotten

February 18, 2014 By Sheep Media

GlobalResearch| The violent turmoil in Syria and Bahrain over the past year, taken together, provides a sharp comparative case study of the deception and hypocrisy of Western governments and the mainstream media.

It also points up the nefarious role of the pro-Western Arab states, in particular the Persian Gulf monarchies headed by Saudi Arabia.

640x392_71733_196875

March 15th marked an exact anniversary for Syria and Bahrain. On the 15 March 2011, Syria saw the beginning of an armed insurgency described as “anti-government protests” in the Southern city of Daraa, on the border with Jordan. While the state forces of President Bashar Al Assad responded ruthlessly, from the outset it was clear that the anti-government “protesters” were heavily armed and well organised.

The events in Syria mirrored those in Libya, where opposition groups were also heavily armed and ready to use violence from the outset. In both Syria and Libya, the apparent protests were distinctly different from those seen in most other Arab countries, such as Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Yemen and Bahrain, where there was a groundswell of popular opposition to the incumbent Western-backed regimes and where dissent was largely peaceful.

This key difference can be explained because Western powers and their proxies, such as the Zionist Regime of Israel, Turkey and the Gulf Arab states, were instrumental in arming and directing the supposed anti-government opposition in both Syria and Libya.

Special forces from NATO powers Britain and France were, tellingly, active on the ground from the get-go, lending their expertise in techniques of sabotage and terrorism.

Saudi Arabia and Qatar in particular were also instrumental in driving events in Syria and Libya, providing financial support, weapons, covert fighters and strident diplomatic backing for the self-styled “transitional councils”. In the instance of Libya, NATO’s involvement was scaled up to a full-blown aerial bombing campaign to assist the so-called rebels on the ground. Such overt NATO aggression has not yet transpired in the case of Syria, but it is a contingency that Western governments are only shying away from for now out of political calculation.

To get back to Syria’s comparative twin in this case study, Bahrain, the Persian Gulf kingdom also saw an upsurge in violence on the 15 March 2011 – but for markedly different reasons.  In the month prior to that date, Bahrain had witnessed a truly mass uprising against the Al Khalifa monarchy.

Peaceful demonstrations in the capital, Manama, drew crowds of up to 300,000 – nearly half the indigenous population of the tiny oil-rich kingdom. The protest movement against the Zionist and US-backed autocratic Sunni rulers had set up a permanent peace camp near the financial district of the capital. After four weeks of peaceful rallies calling for the downfall of the monarchy, the Bahraini uprising was ruthlessly attacked by the combined state forces of Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the other members of the so-called Gulf Peninsula Shield Force which had crossed the King Fahd Causeway linking Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. The military invasion to crush a civilian pro-democracy movement – one that was merely calling for an elected government to replace the decades-long dictatorship of the Al Khalifa dynasty – was given the green light by both Washington and London. [1]

Of the many tragic ironies in this case study, perhaps the one that takes the dubious laurels for notoriety is the role of Saudi Arabia. Here we have the most repressive regime in the world: a ruthless, absolute monarchy ruled by the decrepit Al Saud family that has brutally crushed peaceful pro-democracy protests over the past year in the Saudi capital, Riyadh, and elsewhere in its oil-rich Eastern Province. Across the 25-kilometre causeway in Bahrain, Saudi-backed troops have subjected the unarmed civilian population to unrelenting violence over 12 months. Every night, Bahraini villages are smothered in teargas fired by Saudi troops and Bahraini mercenary police recruited with foreign Sunni expatriates. [2] [3] Proportionate to its population, the toll of Bahraini civilians killed at the hands of pro-regime forces runs into thousands – comparable to that of Syria. However, in Syria, the death toll includes some 50 per cent of victims from state military who have been combating an armed opposition that is equipped and fomented by Saudi Arabia, among several other foreign powers, including NATO.

Nevertheless, the unelected and widely reviled regime in Bahrain continues to enjoy unblemished membership of the Arab League. By contrast, Syria’s Bashar Al Assad government – which appears to have popular support – has had its membership of the Arab League suspended – a sanction that was vehemently drummed up by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf dictatorships that invaded Bahrain to extirpate a popular, peaceful pro-democracy movement.  Nauseatingly, the royal despots of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar have made bombastic calls for the secular government of Syria to step down and give way to political reforms – in the face of violence that has been fuelled in part by these despots.

The temptation to award Saudi Arabia the dubious laurels for hypocrisy and deception must be resisted, however. Reprehensible and disgusting though it is, the Al Saud regime still does not come close to Washington, London and their Western allies, including the Zionist mainstream media, for their utter cynicism.

Bashar Al Assad is roundly denounced by Obama, Clinton, Cameron and Hague; while Bahrain’s King Hamad Al Khalifa is given the red-carpet treatment in Washington and London, and roundly praised as “an important ally”.

Co-conspirators with Saudi Arabia, the Western powers and their propaganda machine have unleashed a violent conflict in Syria and branded it a “popular uprising” – part of a heroic, Western-romanticized Arab Spring. [4] In reality, the events in Syria are a squalid fabrication, not unlike those in Libya, designed to serve the cynical geopolitical interests of the Western imperial powers in the world’s oil-well region. The disposal of Al Assad’s Syria, a non-vassal state, is a key prize for the Western imperialists and their Arab stooges. Clarion calls to Syria for democracy and human rights are sickeningly hollow and baseless and designed to create a pretext for illicit regime change.

How do we know? Because Bahrain is the Litmus test for credibility. In the kingdom of Bahrain where a true pro-democracy Arab Spring is actually struggling to bear fruit, the Western powers, their Zionist media and their tyrannical Arab proxies have done everything to kill it, bury it and to forget it.

About the author; Finian Cunningham is Global Research’s Middle East and East Africa Correspondent.

Filed Under: Foreign Affairs, Propaganda, Terrorism, War, Zionism Tagged With: A Sheep No More, Bahrain, Bahrain Uprising Organic, Britain, France, NATO, Qatar, Saudi Arabi, Syria, Syrian President Bashar Assad, Zionism

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS
  • Twitter

About A Sheep No More

A Sheep No More is no longer plugged into the Matrix like the many sheep who are still programmed to believe that they have correct information provided by a varied and “independent media.” In fact the media is owned by 5 or 6 mega-media companies run by corporate advertising executives and Washington.

Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Never miss a word from us. Get email updates!

Archives

Copyright © 2017 Sheep Media. All Rights Reserved.